Terry Zarsoff
First Grader
Pass the cider.Gees your drawing a long bow there Waz.
Just sayin’
Pass the cider.Gees your drawing a long bow there Waz.
Just sayin’
Channel 9 Sydney’s Danny Weidler will be all over it, with exclusive footage.Cum Wat(son) May, we may never know the real story
Great post 💯He is on <600K as per Daily Telegraph listing richest players. I'd say 500k at most, given Saab is on like 250k.
"The team is only as strong as it's weakest link"
The weakest link on the goal line is Garrick. I'm a Garrick defender, and even to me, that is obvious enough. However, if you got rid of Garrick, they'd start targeting Talau, Koula, or someone else. Thinking that he's the difference between us now and conceding 100 less points in a season is flawed. The team's true weakest link is our pathetic defence through the middle, and lack of commitment to winning games. If it's not Garrick they'll find someone else, when they march through us to the goal line.
Lack of commitment to winning games....,.seriously up there with dumbest view of the year.He is on <600K as per Daily Telegraph listing richest players. I'd say 500k at most, given Saab is on like 250k.
"The team is only as strong as it's weakest link"
The weakest link on the goal line is Garrick. I'm a Garrick defender, and even to me, that is obvious enough. However, if you got rid of Garrick, they'd start targeting Talau, Koula, or someone else. Thinking that he's the difference between us now and conceding 100 less points in a season is flawed. The team's true weakest link is our pathetic defence through the middle, and lack of commitment to winning games. If it's not Garrick they'll find someone else, when they march through us to the goal line.
Lack of respect for other posters views is calling them dumbLack of commitment to winning games....,.seriously up there with dumbest view of the year.
This side has been been in every game this year.
And that is certainly a great improvement.This side has been been in every game this year.
Aw,that is awesome,but has nothing to do with what I said,once again.Lack of respect for other posters views is calling them dumb
I do do agree with your views feathered friend @Adz
Consistency is the key to be in every game
This side has been inconsistent all year /Win one lose two /Win two lose one
and could only manage 3 wins in a row just once
round 1 win
round 2 win
round 3 loss
round 4 loss
round 5 win
round 6 draw
round 7 win
round 8 win
round 9 loss
round 10 loss
round 11 loss
round 12win
round 13 bye
round 13 loss
round 15 win
round 16 loss
round 17 bye
round 18 win
round 19 win
round 20 win
round 21 loss
round 22 bye
round 23 win
round 24 win
round 25 loss
round 26 win
round 27 and our last home game against the Sharks where a win would secure us a finals home game but our inconsistency through out the season shone through once again as the Sharks humiliated us in front of our supporters by 40 points to 20
And our 40 points capitulation semi final seasons exit against the Roosters side which was missing their key spine players in walker and smith was another Icing on our Inconsistent seasons cake that Seibold baked
View attachment 28568
I agree with the poor middle/ruck defence but I don't think it's a lack of commitment. It happened far too often for it to be an issue of mental application. There's a footballing matter at play; we've got a sluggish pack and eventually the middle opens up as a result. They're trying but they're ineffective.And that is certainly a great improvement.
The issue is taking it to the 80 minute mark. Far too many times did we lose focus and let the other side walk back into the game. It's purely related to game management, and the team needs to have the belief that they can hold out. We were competitive on the scoreboard, but on far too many occasions, this would only be for 40 minutes, and we would be run down from behind. It's something we improved on towards the backend (that Tigers game was some BS), but it's still the same lack of commitment to defending through the middle, and letting sloppy errors and ruck infringements into the picture. Mestrov even said that himself on a podcast.
Those collapses don't happen with a better middle. That includes Mr Ruck Infringements in Jake. He was part of the problem in that regard.
Once again we agree to disagreeAw,that is awesome,but has nothing to do with what I said,once again.
We seem to think our way to winning is by blowing teams off the parkAnd that is certainly a great improvement.
The issue is taking it to the 80 minute mark. Far too many times did we lose focus and let the other side walk back into the game. It's purely related to game management, and the team needs to have the belief that they can hold out. We were competitive on the scoreboard, but on far too many occasions, this would only be for 40 minutes, and we would be run down from behind. It's something we improved on towards the backend (that Tigers game was some BS), but it's still the same lack of commitment to defending through the middle, and letting sloppy errors and ruck infringements into the picture. Mestrov even said that himself on a podcast.
Those collapses don't happen with a better middle. That includes Mr Ruck Infringements in Jake. He was part of the problem in that regard.
I think being a train and trial contract it could be worth the riskNow Seibold wants to moneybags a 33 year old forward to Manly - Siosiua Taukeiaho. He had his contract ripped up by the Catalans Dragons.
Will this ever stop?
Ex-Super League man to sign deal with NRL club after release
NRL side Manly Sea Eagles look set to sign former Catalans Dragons forward Siosiua Taukeiaho, according to reports Down Under. Taukeiaho has been without a club since seeing his contract ripped up by the Dragons in July due to behaviour that was deemed to be highly unacceptable. He has been...www.seriousaboutrl.com
I think being a train and trial contract it could be worth the risk
Im just assuming its a train and trial until we unload someone. Its just a pre committment . I dont think there is any real risk unless its injury related. If he comes he is on the waiting list, not trialingI think being a train and trial contract it could be worth the risk
To me it is more like a landscaper.Im just assuming its a train and trial until we unload someone. Its just a pre committment . I dont think there is any real risk unless its injury related. If he comes he is on the waiting list, not trialing
Just checking, are you explaining the train and trial concept or how that x rooster is being counted on manlys books and intentionsTo me it is more like a landscaper.
The landscaper shows the potential customer some pictures,saying here is my work and how good I am,pay me now before the job is done.
The customer says,no thanks,here is a deposit for supplies,I will pay you later when you show me you are committed and following through on the job and prove it to me.
There are some dodgy landscapers out there.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
24 | 19 | 5 | 243 | 44 | |
24 | 17 | 7 | 186 | 40 | |
24 | 16 | 8 | 275 | 38 | |
24 | 16 | 8 | 222 | 38 | |
24 | 15 | 9 | 89 | 36 | |
24 | 14 | 10 | 96 | 34 | |
24 | 13 | 10 | 113 | 33 | |
24 | 12 | 12 | -40 | 30 | |
24 | 12 | 12 | -127 | 30 | |
24 | 11 | 13 | -1 | 28 | |
24 | 11 | 13 | -126 | 28 | |
24 | 10 | 14 | -70 | 26 | |
24 | 9 | 14 | -62 | 25 | |
24 | 8 | 16 | -168 | 22 | |
24 | 7 | 17 | -155 | 20 | |
24 | 7 | 17 | -188 | 20 | |
24 | 6 | 18 | -287 | 18 |