Rex said:What you're saying Volley is that they charge based on their preconceptions of the player, not on the incident itself.
If so the players like Matai get hit with a loading twice, maybe three times if it influences an innocent/guilty verdict in any way.
Garts said:Rex said:What you're saying Volley is that they charge based on their preconceptions of the player, not on the incident itself.
If so the players like Matai get hit with a loading twice, maybe three times if it influences an innocent/guilty verdict in any way.
If some is continually charged with drink driving do you think they should be penalised more severely than a first time offender?
Rex said:What you're saying Volley is that they charge based on their preconceptions of the player, not on the incident itself.
If so the players like Matai get hit with a loading twice, maybe three times if it influences an innocent/guilty verdict in any way.
The Eagle said:Garts said:Rex said:What you're saying Volley is that they charge based on their preconceptions of the player, not on the incident itself.
If so the players like Matai get hit with a loading twice, maybe three times if it influences an innocent/guilty verdict in any way.
If some is continually charged with drink driving do you think they should be penalised more severely than a first time offender?
I thought common law said a man shouldn't have evidence from his previous similar offenses weighed against him with new charges
Volley said:Rex said:What you're saying Volley is that they charge based on their preconceptions of the player, not on the incident itself.
If so the players like Matai get hit with a loading twice, maybe three times if it influences an innocent/guilty verdict in any way.
Hi Rex, Garts answered for me.
I think Matai would get the same charge, but loading would increase his punishment.
The Eagle said:Garts said:Rex said:What you're saying Volley is that they charge based on their preconceptions of the player, not on the incident itself.
If so the players like Matai get hit with a loading twice, maybe three times if it influences an innocent/guilty verdict in any way.
If some is continually charged with drink driving do you think they should be penalised more severely than a first time offender?
I thought common law said a man shouldn't have evidence from his previous similar offenses weighed against him with new charges
As fro said, guilt from prior offences can't be used to prove guilt of a new charge, but it can be used in sentencing.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 | 4 | 1 | 23 | 10 | |
5 | 4 | 1 | 14 | 10 | |
6 | 4 | 2 | 48 | 8 | |
6 | 4 | 2 | 28 | 8 | |
5 | 3 | 2 | 25 | 8 | |
5 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 8 | |
6 | 3 | 2 | 38 | 7 | |
6 | 3 | 2 | 21 | 7 | |
6 | 3 | 3 | 37 | 6 | |
6 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 6 | |
6 | 3 | 3 | -13 | 6 | |
5 | 2 | 3 | -15 | 6 | |
6 | 3 | 3 | -36 | 6 | |
6 | 2 | 4 | -5 | 4 | |
6 | 2 | 4 | -7 | 4 | |
5 | 0 | 5 | -86 | 2 | |
6 | 1 | 5 | -102 | 2 |