Rambo1987 said:Manly - Phil Bailey
Fluffy said:Hoppa has been poor for parra too, Sandow has offered much more
detinusdeel said:Like Manly have never brought a rep player
globaleagle said:During the game rabs mentioned that there was only one roosters junior playing tonight....and that was for manly.
I think of comments like these when trying to ease the pain of a loss.
Supporting a bred not bought team such as Manly whose players take pay cuts....as opposed to the rorters;
The ultimate soulless, fly in, fly out group of mercenaries you'll ever meet.
Happy with my choice.
Hamster Huey said:globaleagle said:During the game rabs mentioned that there was only one roosters junior playing tonight....and that was for manly.
I think of comments like these when trying to ease the pain of a loss.
Supporting a bred not bought team such as Manly whose players take pay cuts....as opposed to the rorters;
The ultimate soulless, fly in, fly out group of mercenaries you'll ever meet.
Happy with my choice.
'Juniors' are a deceptive term. The Roosters have just four junior clubs to draw from. When you compare that to even us, that is a distinct disadvantage to seeing any decent number of them develop into NRL standard players.
A better measure is how many the club developed directly through their system or debut with the club. Not sure it improves the Roosters numbers by much, but it's a fair assessment to use.
Bwahahaha! Love it.globaleagle said:Hamster Huey said:globaleagle said:During the game rabs mentioned that there was only one roosters junior playing tonight....and that was for manly.
I think of comments like these when trying to ease the pain of a loss.
Supporting a bred not bought team such as Manly whose players take pay cuts....as opposed to the rorters;
The ultimate soulless, fly in, fly out group of mercenaries you'll ever meet.
Happy with my choice.
'Juniors' are a deceptive term. The Roosters have just four junior clubs to draw from. When you compare that to even us, that is a distinct disadvantage to seeing any decent number of them develop into NRL standard players.
A better measure is how many the club developed directly through their system or debut with the club. Not sure it improves the Roosters numbers by much, but it's a fair assessment to use.
Think I'll still stick with Manly.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 | 5 | 1 | 59 | 12 | |
6 | 5 | 1 | 20 | 12 | |
6 | 4 | 2 | 53 | 10 | |
6 | 4 | 2 | 30 | 10 | |
7 | 4 | 2 | 25 | 9 | |
7 | 4 | 3 | 40 | 8 | |
7 | 4 | 3 | 24 | 8 | |
7 | 4 | 3 | -8 | 8 | |
7 | 4 | 3 | -18 | 8 | |
7 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 7 | |
7 | 3 | 4 | 31 | 6 | |
7 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 6 | |
6 | 2 | 4 | -31 | 6 | |
7 | 3 | 4 | -41 | 6 | |
7 | 2 | 5 | -29 | 4 | |
6 | 1 | 5 | -102 | 4 | |
6 | 0 | 6 | -90 | 2 |