Eagles2nv said:Fozza is back at training. This was posted on NRlL.com, thought you might be interested.
http://www.nrl.com/we-can-go-back-to-back-foran/tabid/10874/newsid/65657/default.aspx
I think we're going to win the comp. every year....I've been right a few times too.Eagles Terrorist said:I'm not sure I really like this.
In 2008 and 2011, if we're all honest, we weren't thinking "we're going to win the comp" - well, we might have hoped, but it wasn't a certainty by any means.
And Des' - we're under the radar approach - worked well in both cases.
Can't we just keep flying under the radar and let others mouth off about how they'll win the comp? Champ to chump only takes a few bad games in such a tight comp.
Eagles Terrorist said:I'm not sure I really like this.
In 2008 and 2011, if we're all honest, we weren't thinking "we're going to win the comp" - well, we might have hoped, but it wasn't a certainty by any means.
And Des' - we're under the radar approach - worked well in both cases.
Can't we just keep flying under the radar and let others mouth off about how they'll win the comp? Champ to chump only takes a few bad games in such a tight comp.
Eagles Terrorist said:I'm not sure I really like this.
In 2008 and 2011, if we're all honest, we weren't thinking "we're going to win the comp" - well, we might have hoped, but it wasn't a certainty by any means.
And Des' - we're under the radar approach - worked well in both cases.
Can't we just keep flying under the radar and let others mouth off about how they'll win the comp? Champ to chump only takes a few bad games in such a tight comp.
Eagles Terrorist said:I'm not sure I really like this.
In 2008 and 2011, if we're all honest, we weren't thinking "we're going to win the comp" - well, we might have hoped, but it wasn't a certainty by any means.
And Des' - we're under the radar approach - worked well in both cases.
Can't we just keep flying under the radar and let others mouth off about how they'll win the comp? Champ to chump only takes a few bad games in such a tight comp.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 | 4 | 1 | 23 | 10 | |
5 | 4 | 1 | 14 | 10 | |
6 | 4 | 2 | 48 | 8 | |
6 | 4 | 2 | 28 | 8 | |
5 | 3 | 2 | 25 | 8 | |
5 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 8 | |
6 | 3 | 2 | 38 | 7 | |
6 | 3 | 2 | 21 | 7 | |
6 | 3 | 3 | 37 | 6 | |
6 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 6 | |
6 | 3 | 3 | -13 | 6 | |
5 | 2 | 3 | -15 | 6 | |
6 | 3 | 3 | -36 | 6 | |
6 | 2 | 4 | -5 | 4 | |
6 | 2 | 4 | -7 | 4 | |
5 | 0 | 5 | -86 | 2 | |
6 | 1 | 5 | -102 | 2 |