Last night Phil Gould revealed to an audience of millions sensitive medical information about Brent Kite including a pending operation. No doubt this was partly so his former club would know to run at Kite's right side next week. However: 1. Was it a breach of a man's right to privacy regarding his medical state? 2. Was it a breach of Gould's contractual obligations and duty of care to an impending employee? 3. Was it potentially a breach of doctor-patient confidentiality (if it was the Penrith doctor who revealed Kite's need for surgery to Gould?) Maybe the NRL integrity unit could investigate since they've done such a sterling job with their own employee.