1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Hindmarsh

Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by Canteen Worker, Jun 27, 2005.

  1. Canteen Worker

    Canteen Worker Well-Known Member

    Ratings:
    +213 /5
    Can NSW play a dirty trick and list him to play for Parra this weekend. After he serves his suspension - missing their game - can NSW then pick him as a late inclusion for Wednesday's game???

    I think QLD did something similar a few years back.

    Interesting selection dilemma if Hindmarsh is ruled out. No Watmough so who do they pick???
     
  2. The Wheel

    The Wheel Well-Known Member

    Ratings:
    +2,086 /73
    Glen Morrison might get a start
     
  3. Volley

    Volley Well-Known Member

    Ratings:
    +634 /22
  4. PJ

    PJ Well-Known Member

    Ratings:
    +49 /1
    Trent Waterhouse- or is he injured?
     
  5. SilentBob

    SilentBob Well-Known Member

    Ratings:
    +4 /0
    He's already been named for NSW so it's too late, should have done the TBA trick.

    If he's out it should be Menzies>in, O'Meley>bench I think.
     
  6. Disco

    Disco Well-Known Member

    Ratings:
    +1,502 /45
    NSW are idiots

    they should have gone the old TBA
     
  7. Matabele

    Matabele Well-Known Member

    Ratings:
    +511 /14
    They closed that loophole after Qld did it with Tuqiri.

    What are you worried about? He plays for NSW. He'll go to the judiciary and get off.

    Mark my words.
     
  8. Canteen Worker

    Canteen Worker Well-Known Member

    Ratings:
    +213 /5
    The old QLD conspiracy theory - always emergences at this time every year.

    The NSW hard heads sitting at desks in Phillip St wondering how they can rort the system to somehow deflect truth, honour and the redneck way. Didn't Joh start this sort of paranoia that Pauline and her ilk capitalised upon in their scare-mongering!
     
  9. CC_Eagle

    CC_Eagle Member

    Ratings:
    +1 /0
    Beaver to start with someone moving to the bench?
     
  10. ManlyBacker

    ManlyBacker Winging it Staff Member

    Ratings:
    +971 /7
    Well the Broncos, read the Queensland decision centre, have Carrol as TBA and he is allowed to line up against the Sharks this weekend, while the Sharks lose Nutley. Now tell me that this isn't a maroon conspiracy. No, couldn't be - they have never done anything like this before!
     
  11. ads

    ads Well-Known Member

    Ratings:
    +29 /1
    QLD rorting the system as usual. Sigh.

    You'd think they would want to win honourably, but no they cant so they try anything. Oh well.
     
  12. Matabele

    Matabele Well-Known Member

    Ratings:
    +511 /14
    Queensland are not advantaged by playing someone this weekend and having them back up 4 days later. I'd say Carrolland Tate or on legitimate trial, maybe with one or two other smokies.

    On the subject of Hindmarsh, even with maroon glasses on, his charge is a helluva koke. What is his crime? Tackling in the same manner that Storm players complete every tackle? Even in the Manly vs Bulldogs game there were countless similar tackles.

    I can't for the life of me work out how he has been charged.
     
  13. PEPSI

    PEPSI Active Member

    Ratings:
    +2 /0
    he tried to sperate a poms head from his shoulders, i have no problem with that, hopefully Brett Lee can do the same in upcoming months
     
  14. Fluffy

    Fluffy Well-Known Member

    18,587
    1,557
    Ratings:
    +4,658 /166
    mata they accusation was an advantage to brisbane, not queensland in reagards to carrol
     
  15. Matabele

    Matabele Well-Known Member

    Ratings:
    +511 /14
    Really Fluffy? :roll:
     
  16. ads

    ads Well-Known Member

    Ratings:
    +29 /1
    No I am accusing Brisbane and QLD and anything relating to either. Mainly cause I'm biased, but you wont hear me admit that.

    It does seem slack. They should put in stronger rules with selection, though this controversy is sure fun!
     

Share This Page