Injury prone?

The Who

Journey Man
This may be my Manly bias showing through but I perceive us to have a lot of injury-prone players. I welcome a statistician to confirm or refute my perception.
Follows is my injury/availability assessment of some of our current players:
Turbo = 40% available
Tent = 55%
Alaoi = 55%
The Lawman = 45%
Burbo = 55%
I'd image an average availability 'pass mark' for an NRL player would be 75% (available for three out of every four matches). Over the years we've had warhorses such as Lyons, Lyon, Beaver, Tooves and Ballin, and currently DCE (must be 98%), Jurbo and Froggy (must both be 90%) available.
Thoughts?
 
IMG_3953.jpeg
 
team Injuries perspective

Injuries are part of the game
Resilience and over coming adversary and keep winning is part of the character in the team that a Great coach can Inspire
 
Is that the cumulative number of weeks players have been injured for (5+ weeks)?
It is yet another reason why Penrith has been so dominant, although the major reason is that they have such a high number of quality players and back-ups.
That’s the total number of 5+ weeks injuries to a player, so of our 42, Tom would have at least 3-4 of those I think

That does illustrate the unbelievable run of Penrith, and also how badly the Tigers and Dragons have performed
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

2020 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Bulldogs 9 8 0 1 106 18
2 Warriors 9 7 0 2 1 16
3 Storm 9 6 0 3 140 14
4 Raiders 10 7 0 3 48 14
5 Sharks 10 6 0 4 65 12
6 Cowboys 9 4 1 4 -14 11
7 Broncos 10 5 0 5 46 10
8 Sea Eagles 9 4 0 5 20 10
9 Roosters 9 4 0 5 -42 10
10 Tigers 10 5 0 5 -44 10
11 Rabbitohs 10 5 0 5 -62 10
12 Dolphins 10 4 0 6 10 8
13 Dragons 9 3 0 6 -15 8
14 Knights 9 3 0 6 -52 8
15 Titans 9 3 0 6 -84 8
16 Panthers 10 3 1 6 -2 7
17 Eels 9 2 0 7 -121 6
Back
Top Bottom