1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Penalty try

Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by manlyfan76, Oct 6, 2013.

  1. manlyfan76

    manlyfan76 Parra Trolls are the best. Premium Member 2017 Tipping Competitor

    9,254
    2,632
    Anywhere but Parramatta
    Ratings:
    +6,383 /136
    I loved it!
    That is all.
     
  2. Mal Cochrane

    Mal Cochrane I'm not really Mal Cochrane...

    735
    218
    Ratings:
    +509 /4
    I thought it was a 50/50 call, there was no one in front of killer so maybe why they gave it.

    That forward pass to level up **** me big time.
     
  3. Volley

    Volley Well-Known Member

    Ratings:
    +644 /22
    Clear pen try.

    The rest of the reffing all went the Chooks way.
     
  4. Stiffi

    Stiffi Active Member 2017 Tipping Competitor

    My Mrs and I counted 15 decisions that should have gone to Manly that didn't!! High odds there were a few more too. Very disappointed to lose!
    [hr]
    Copious amounts of Vodka is masking the pain!
     
  5. sheridanstand78

    sheridanstand78 Well-Known Member

    3,050
    1,536
    Ratings:
    +3,596 /53
    The question I have is that if they deem it to be a penalty try, why was the Rorters player not given 10 minutes in the bin for the professional foul? It was a big call and there is no doubt that Jamie had a legitimate chance to score.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • StuBoot

      StuBoot Well-Known Member 2017 Tipping Competitor

      Ratings:
      +871 /8
      It's either one or the other, they're never going to do both.
      You could argue what is more of a punishment - conceding a try or 10 in the bin?
      9/10 times Lyon scores so penalty try sufficient
       
    • Killer03

      Killer03 Well-Known Member

      2,576
      1,498
      Ratings:
      +3,031 /31
      What happened with a penalty try being 8 points? ie kick from where the try was and then kick in front? Did that rule change?
       
    • yokahontas

      yokahontas Well-Known Member Premium Member

      788
      310
      Ratings:
      +1,778 /17
      Penalty try and 'possible 8 pt try' are two different things - for the extra kick, the try is actually scored but there's an act of foul play at the same time - so try, conversion attempt and a penalty kick on top of that. Tonight the foul play actually stopped the try being scored, so there wasn't an opportunity to award a 'possible 8 pointer'.

      It's a bit like basketball, get fouled and miss the shot, two free throws. Get fouled, make the shot anyway, you get the two points you actually scored plus a free throw for a possible third point.
       
    • Killer03

      Killer03 Well-Known Member

      2,576
      1,498
      Ratings:
      +3,031 /31
      Ah gotcha, thanks yokahontas.
       
    • Ian Martin tragic

      Ian Martin tragic Well-Known Member

      981
      121
      Ratings:
      +137 /0
      No try for mine. Broke a precedent of being 99.9% certain a try would have been scored. GF is not the time to be doing that. A penalty and 10 mins in the bin. Might have been more useful but que sera sera.
       
    • Top End Eagle

      Top End Eagle Well-Known Member Premium Member 2017 Tipping Competitor

      Ratings:
      +1,410 /98
      Not sure if this has been mentioned but wouldn't a penalty and Aubusson in the bin for ten be better for us in the run of the game anyway? Ten minutes against twelve men in a game like that would have been handy.
       
    • Hamster Huey

      Hamster Huey Space Invader Premium Member

      Ratings:
      +1,096 /8
      It's a grey area but I must say that after pondering it over night, it was a fair call.

      No try is 100% until the ball is actually grounded and it would appear that the refs considered the situation more akin to Lyon being far more likely to score, than not.

      The low bounce actually benefitted Lyon to collect the ball and dive over with little chance of Aubusson or Mortimer likely to turn him over.

      I'd take the 4-pts on offer over the sinbin every time.
       
    • ManlyBacker

      ManlyBacker Winging it Staff Member

      Ratings:
      +971 /7
      In a GF I'd take the points every time.
       
    • Moondog

      Moondog Amazing Blue Footed Boobie 2017 Tipping Competitor

      5,352
      2,136
      Hervey Bay
      Ratings:
      +4,154 /36
      Did anybody else think it was strange Hayne ruled try when it obviously was'nt and when it was sent upstairs he was overuled and a penalty try awarded.
      Try would have been a better result for Haynes team as the kick would not have been taken from directly in front and perhaps resulted in four points rather than six.
       
    • simon64

      simon64 Well-Known Member Premium Member

      2,345
      1,014
      Ratings:
      +2,202 /29
      The penalty try should have been awarded AND he should have gone to the bin.

      It's unbelievable how Cronk's non sin binning against the Nots started a spate of sin binnings for about 3 weeks and then.............nothing. Can we just get some consistency ?

      For mine, the sin bin is there and it should be used when its warranted. Not ignored for 20 weeks then flogged to death.
       
    • Lord Eagleton

      Lord Eagleton Well-Known Member

      Ratings:
      +1,019 /29
      Sometimes when you plan to cheat heavily in one direction, its good to throw a few scraps in the other direction, just to make it look like you are impartial. Thats what i put the penalty try decision down to. Once it passed Hayne put his red, white and blue coloured glasses on and the rest as they say, is history
       
    • Napper

      Napper Well-Known Member

      Ratings:
      +803 /2
      I don't understand

      If killer got a penalty try, why didn't we

      a) get 2 shots at goal

      or

      b) see Aubusson get binned?
       
    • manlyfan76

      manlyfan76 Parra Trolls are the best. Premium Member 2017 Tipping Competitor

      9,254
      2,632
      Anywhere but Parramatta
      Ratings:
      +6,383 /136
      RE: I don't understand

      Penalty try not 8 point try there is a difference.
      Not sin binned? There is no good answer to that one.
       
    • The Who

      The Who Well-Known Member

      7,629
      2,330
      Mona Vale
      Ratings:
      +5,606 /117
      RE: I don't understand

      I thought it was a penalty try. But perhaps a greater punishment would have been playing Easts with 12 men for 10 minutes.
      I give the ref a tick for this decision. Mind you, it was the only tick I gave them for the match.
       
    • Chip and Chase

      Chip and Chase True Supporter Staff Member Administrator Premium Member 2017 Tipping Competitor

      13,195
      3,274
      Ratings:
      +6,876 /51
      RE: I don't understand

      You can't give a penalty try AND sin bin someone.

      I must admit I thought the decision to award a penalty try was a brave one. Never knock back 6 points in a grand final but I wonder what effect playing with 12 men for 10 mins would have had on the roosters had they gone the sin bin instead.
       

    Share This Page