Yes! Didn't Gee explain to outraged dragons captain that the reason there was no sin bin was because the bunker had made the call??[st_table="45%"][st_tr][st_td_row="2"][/st_td_row][st_td]Super Freak - broncoshq.com[/st_td][/st_tr][st_tr][st_td="0.7"]JOINED: .January 25, 2014
MESSAGES: 30,582
Reaction Score: 17,679[/st_td][/st_tr][/st_table]
Bunker officials should have been dropped, as well.
[st_table="45%"][st_tr][st_td_row="2"][/st_td_row][st_td]Super Freak - broncoshq.com[/st_td][/st_tr][st_tr][st_td="0.7"]JOINED: .January 25, 2014
MESSAGES: 30,584
Reaction Score: 17,685[/st_td][/st_tr][/st_table]
There isn’t a fix.
The reality is, this comp will never be truly even. All of the top clubs are always going to be able to attract star players, especially for less, because there’s a higher chance of success at those clubs and a higher chance of playing rep footy.
The draft seems to work well in AFL, but I understand that the Dennis Tutty successful challenge all those years ago throws a legal spanner into it.[st_table="45%"][st_tr][st_td_row="2"][/st_td_row][st_td]Super Freak - broncoshq.com[/st_td][/st_tr][st_tr][st_td="0.7"]JOINED: .January 25, 2014
MESSAGES: 30,584
Reaction Score: 17,685[/st_td][/st_tr][/st_table]
There isn’t a fix.
The reality is, this comp will never be truly even. All of the top clubs are always going to be able to attract star players, especially for less, because there’s a higher chance of success at those clubs and a higher chance of playing rep footy.
You can bring in a draft, but modern footy players are fickle people. They won’t stand for a system that could send them to a club they hate.
In situations like that the highest bid value should be the value that goes against the cap wherever the player plays. That’s their market value.[st_table="45%"][st_tr][st_td_row="2"][/st_td_row][st_td]Browny - broncoshq.com[/st_td][/st_tr][st_tr][st_td="0.7"]JOINED: .April 8, 2008
MESSAGES: 9,759
Reaction Score: 3,810[/st_td][/st_tr][/st_table]
If you had a choice of 500k to play for the Storm or 800k for the Tigers, Id take a pay cut to play for the Storm
Its better to be judged by 12 then carried by 6.
[st_table="45%"][st_tr][st_td_row="2"][/st_td_row][st_td]wizards rage - nzwarriors.com[/st_td][/st_tr][st_tr][st_td="0.7"]JOINED: .April 18, 2016
MESSAGES: 6,602
REACTIONS: 17,497[/st_td][/st_tr][/st_table]
In situations like that the highest bid value should be the value that goes against the cap wherever the player plays. That’s their market value.
Signing a player for unders because you offer ‘other intangible benefits’ circumvents the money based design of the cap. They ‘other intangible benefits’ actually has a $300k value in your example.
Auction the players value, then they chose a club?
Smash em bro
[st_table="45%"][st_tr][st_td_row="2"][/st_td_row][st_td]BeastMode - nzwarriors.com[/st_td][/st_tr][st_tr][st_td="0.7"]JOINED: .March 7, 2015
MESSAGES: 10,182
REACTIONS: 20,301[/st_td][/st_tr][/st_table]
Can you tell me a professional comp or sport where this isn’t the case?
We do a hell of a lot better than rugby, soccer, basketball when it comes to competitiveness
If clubs tried to game it, it could backfire if they push up the price and end up with the player…[st_table="45%"][st_tr][st_td_row="2"][/st_td_row][st_td]Foordy - broncoshq.com[/st_td][/st_tr][st_tr][st_td="0.7"]JOINED: .March 3, 2008
MESSAGES: 26,873
Reaction Score: 25,321[/st_td][/st_tr][/st_table]
you think player agents are shady now ... wait until they start exploiting that rule
JOIN THE #KEVOLUTION
| Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
8 | 7 | 1 | 109 | 16 |
|
8 | 7 | 1 | 56 | 16 |
|
8 | 6 | 2 | 66 | 14 |
|
8 | 5 | 3 | 51 | 12 |
|
9 | 5 | 3 | 37 | 11 |
|
9 | 5 | 4 | 95 | 10 |
|
9 | 5 | 4 | 42 | 10 |
|
8 | 4 | 4 | 25 | 10 |
|
9 | 5 | 4 | -14 | 10 |
|
9 | 4 | 5 | -16 | 8 |
|
9 | 4 | 5 | -19 | 8 |
|
8 | 3 | 5 | -55 | 8 |
|
9 | 4 | 5 | -70 | 8 |
|
9 | 3 | 5 | 11 | 7 |
|
8 | 2 | 6 | -63 | 6 |
|
8 | 1 | 7 | -89 | 4 |
|
8 | 1 | 7 | -166 | 4 |
