That Reynolds 'try'

  • We had an issue with background services between march 10th and 15th or there about. This meant the payment services were not linking to automatic upgrades. If you paid for premium membership and are still seeing ads please let me know and the email you used against PayPal and I cam manually verify and upgrade your account.
More impressive was his standing somersault (on one leg) to milk the penalty to decide the game.
 
Not sure why Hayne went upstairs for that. He was 18 inches from where the ball was put down.

Either he awards it, or disallows it. Should not of been referred.
 
Penalty at the end was a joke... Listen to the replay... No way that tackle could have been stopped after he said held. Wannabe traffic cops...
 
Disgraceful decision for the try to be given. The dive from Reynolds for the penalty shows how useless these pink pri**s are. I hate golden point too.
 
THe video refs should just post diving scores after that rubbish. Hodkinson seems to have learnt a lot from Reynolds after the tap from DCE made him throw himself backwards for another perfect 10 that earned a penalty.
 
bob dylan said:
Not sure why Hayne went upstairs for that. He was 18 inches from where the ball was put down.

Either he awards it, or disallows it. Should not of been referred.

Exact words from a Roosters fan - that was a joke Hayne should be stood down for that.

Still filthy by all this myself
 
Thing was,he said try,so they couldn't prove it wasn't.If he said "no try",then they couldn't have proved it was.Inclonclusive both ways.As you say,"white cane" hayne was close enough to adjudicate,just to gutless to make a FULL call.
 
GI has got Inu and Fa'aso now 3 times so why are we surprised that other players are now getting into it
 
Why in this day can we not get a camera shot from above or side on of the try line? We managed to get one that showed Pritchard scoring. Why not one of Reynolds 'no try' try. Put cameras on the bloody goal posts ffs.
 
ayjay007 said:
Thing was,he said try,so they couldn't prove it wasn't.If he said "no try",then they couldn't have proved it was.Inclonclusive both ways.As you say,"white cane" hayne was close enough to adjudicate,just to gutless to make a FULL call.

yes that is true.... but the replays clearly showed he was short...the manly player picked it up short of the line...

disgusting decision
 
panash said:
ayjay007 said:
Thing was,he said try,so they couldn't prove it wasn't.If he said "no try",then they couldn't have proved it was.Inclonclusive both ways.As you say,"white cane" hayne was close enough to adjudicate,just to gutless to make a FULL call.

yes that is true.... but the replays clearly showed he was short...the manly player picked it up short of the line...

disgusting decision

Yes it was clear but unfortunately not clear enough. If we had a shot similar to the Pritchard on the line try then that would have proved it. Funny how we have a camera shot that proves Pritchard reached the line but not one to show that Reynolds didn't?
 
Honestly a better angle wasn't required: it was bloody obvious it was well short.

Disgraceful decision whichever way you cut it.
 
Team P W L PD Pts
3 3 0 48 6
4 3 1 28 6
3 2 1 10 6
4 2 2 39 4
3 2 1 28 4
3 2 1 15 4
3 2 1 14 4
2 1 1 13 4
2 1 1 6 4
3 2 1 -3 4
3 1 2 0 2
3 1 2 -5 2
3 1 2 -15 2
3 1 2 -22 2
3 1 2 -36 2
2 0 2 -56 2
3 0 3 -64 0
Back
Top Bottom