
Sea Eagles sign hooker Nathaniel Roache
NRL hooker Nathaniel Roache has signed a train and replacement contract for 2023 with the Manly Warringah Sea Eagles.

What in the name of Stan Jurd's jockstrap is a train and replacement contract ??
It's his cousin, ..................who has a fear of...........Is Nathaniel Roach related to Nathaniel Roache?
It's a contract where you think you're getting this:![]()
Sea Eagles sign hooker Nathaniel Roache
NRL hooker Nathaniel Roache has signed a train and replacement contract for 2023 with the Manly Warringah Sea Eagles.www.seaeagles.com.au
What in the name of Stan Jurd's jockstrap is a train and replacement contract ??
Well they couldn’t give to Grant “ my old man used to play for the Eels “ Atkins could they ???
And who else ???
Refereeing stocks are very low at present
I think all clubs are having to do this until the nrl tells them what the cap isIsn’t this what Matt Lodge is on at the Roosters???
About $1000 a week and match payments if he gets elevated.
Isn’t this what Matt Lodge is on at the Roosters???
About $1000 a week and match payments if he gets elevated.
Which is all bull$hit, Lodge got an early massive payout from the Broncos, then another massive payout from the Warriors, so he's been basically paid out to 2025 or thereabouts, so money is not his main objective, the fact that he's willing to play for the Roosters for peanuts should not be a factor for him not being included in the Roosters' salary cap.Isn’t this what Matt Lodge is on at the Roosters???
About $1000 a week and match payments if he gets elevated.
Which is all bull$hit, Lodge got an early massive payout from the Broncos, then another massive payout from the Warriors, so he's been basically paid out to 2025 or thereabouts, so money is not his main objective, the fact that he's willing to play for the Roosters for peanuts should not be a factor for him not being included in the Roosters' salary cap.
He is at least a $600k a year player and should be assessed as such, regardless of what he's willing to accept just to play the game.
I don't care if he want plays for nothing, the Roosters are having their cake and eating it as well, they will pay him fark all, and be basically salary cap free for his services, can anyone else get in on a deal like this, what would the outcry be if it was Manly doing this?.
Abdomen and the Veelander…they’re working out so well…I think all clubs are having to do this until the nrl tells them what the cap is
Manly are doing it with Cooper Johns and did it this season with SegeyaroWhich is all bull$hit, Lodge got an early massive payout from the Broncos, then another massive payout from the Warriors, so he's been basically paid out to 2025 or thereabouts, so money is not his main objective, the fact that he's willing to play for the Roosters for peanuts should not be a factor for him not being included in the Roosters' salary cap.
He is at least a $600k a year player and should be assessed as such, regardless of what he's willing to accept just to play the game.
I don't care if he want plays for nothing, the Roosters are having their cake and eating it as well, they will pay him fark all, and be basically salary cap free for his services, can anyone else get in on a deal like this, what would the outcry be if it was Manly doing this?.
It appears that there may not be across the board consensus on who are the 'bargain bin' players in the NRL - but I'll bet that Lodge is not.Manly are doing it with Cooper Johns and did it this season with Segeyaro
I was hoping somebody would share the Roache clip…
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 74 | 14 |
2 | Storm | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 78 | 12 |
3 | Raiders | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 58 | 12 |
4 | Warriors | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | -4 | 12 |
5 | Broncos | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 78 | 10 |
6 | Cowboys | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | -10 | 10 |
7 | Sharks | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 39 | 8 |
8 | Sea Eagles | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 36 | 8 |
9 | Tigers | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 8 |
10 | Dragons | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | -8 | 8 |
11 | Rabbitohs | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | -44 | 8 |
12 | Dolphins | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 16 | 6 |
13 | Roosters | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | -52 | 6 |
14 | Titans | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -68 | 6 |
15 | Knights | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -74 | 6 |
16 | Eels | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -107 | 6 |
17 | Panthers | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -26 | 4 |