1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Will the tigpies be the death of refs

Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by Fluffy, Mar 9, 2012.

  1. Fluffy

    Fluffy Well-Known Member

    18,614
    1,566
    Ratings:
    +4,689 /166
    2 weeks and 4 sackings after that and last week

    Obviously the bookies new something to have the tigpies as favourites
     
    • Troll Troll x 1
    • globaleagle

      globaleagle Le ver vert va vers le verre vert! Premium Member 2017 Tipping Competitor

      12,724
      5,087
      Ratings:
      +9,382 /74
      I dunno, but the tigpies found out why it's important to pay cummings for both halves instead of just the first one.
       
    • Moondog

      Moondog Amazing Blue Footed Boobie 2017 Tipping Competitor

      5,353
      2,137
      Hervey Bay
      Ratings:
      +4,157 /36
      Probably asked for a pay rise at halftime and got his nose out of joint when he was knocked back. He's got a case, I thought he performed wonderfully for them in the first forty minutes.
       
    • Pablo

      Pablo Well-Known Member Premium Member 2017 Tipping Competitor

      Ratings:
      +1,598 /20
      Seems like its ok to walk forward a metre or 2 before playing the ball again this year.
      The unwritten rule of ignore anything the team behind on the score board does wrong is alive and strong also.
       
    • DSM5

      DSM5 Well-Known Member

      Ratings:
      +516 /0
      Choc penalized for facing the wrong way in playing the ball, they kick the penalty. Tiggers player does exactly the same thing in front of their posts, play on. From where I sat the Tiggers were back the eight, what's everyone complaining about?
       
    • Dan

      Dan Administrator Staff Member Administrator 2017 Tipping Competitor 2016 Tipping Competitor

      32,866
      3,853
      Amsterdam, The Netherlands
      Ratings:
      +6,356 /94
      Isn't the rule that the ball has to travel back, so it doesn't mateer if they are facing exactly forward
       
    • Supernintendo Chalmers

      Supernintendo Chalmers Well-Known Member

      802
      279
      Ratings:
      +523 /6
      they got warned about that, stopped for 3 minutes then carried on as usual. whats the point in warnings if you arent going to act on them.
       
    • Fluffy

      Fluffy Well-Known Member

      18,614
      1,566
      Ratings:
      +4,689 /166
      Utai got hip thrown into the ground yet that was not dominant but the shoulder charge on choc earlier was - 2 penalties to the tigpies

      Kicks for touch, tap 3 metres from the line, us on the line 13m away. Flip sides and its 10m (correctly) spaced.

      Scrum to Manly, ref warns their lock to not break early as he breaks, he then makes the tackle, play on.

      2nd half tigers fumble it back trying to offload through 3 players 6 again, only manly players were in the tackle.

      Choc goes to offload ball fall behind him then back into his arms, knock on. Late in the second Lawrence? does the same thing play on
       
      • Like Like x 1
      • castle eagle

        castle eagle Well-Known Member 2017 Tipping Competitor

        newcastle
        Ratings:
        +718 /6
        how about the tiggers second last play, when they went to the left then back to the right. gave the ball to benji, he ran behind a team mate which looked to me an obstruction & refs let it go. fortunately they didn't score off their last play
         
      • Dan

        Dan Administrator Staff Member Administrator 2017 Tipping Competitor 2016 Tipping Competitor

        32,866
        3,853
        Amsterdam, The Netherlands
        Ratings:
        +6,356 /94
        Agreed and choc was completely obstructed he ran into the player then fake fell down but he still had no chance because that man was there.

        I have heard two tigers supporters now say they got the rub of the green
         
      • Brissie Kid

        Brissie Kid Well-Known Member

        Ratings:
        +964 /12
        I think the ref was actually hoping it would end with a try so he could toss it into the lap of the video box.

        When the Tigers were tackled short about 30m up and across field they just would have looked stupid going back to the obstruction to give Manly a penalty (that should've given immediately it happened).

        Farah spent all night tossing himself late on already tackled Manly players.

        Tigers players kept walking off the mark. This meant the Manly markers weren't square, so Farah then ran at them trying to get a penalty or for the ref to call the defenders out.

        Lawrence's "dominant" tackle on Choc wasn't a dominant tackle. The ref called it based on the hit, but given Lawrence then slid off Choc, and Choc could so easily stand up, calling it "dominant" was ridiculous.

        What's the ref expect Choc to do if no one is on top of him in this stupid "dominant" call? Lay on the ground motionless till Lawrence saunters back to marker?
         

      Share This Page