20 minutes

[ads]

We should play Orford off the bench, as he only can be bothered trying for 20 minutes.

All the Monas, Burns knockers - as least they try the whole whole game. Orford doesn't talk, he doesn't try.

Why the hell is it when Manly pays big bucks for half backs they suck.

 

[Fluffy]

Something needs to be done.

I was never for the drop him to PL option but after today it has entered my mind as a viable alternative

 

[PEPSI]

if they only played like that all game!

didnt think Burns did much.

Monaghs was good.

 

[Nutzcraw]

Do this...


Have a look at Manly's halves combination for the last 4 years... I'm sure you'll find we had more points in us and a better winning percentage with Monaghan/Burns as our halves then any other combination.

 

[fLIP]

Do this...


Have a look at Manly's halves combination for the last 4 years... I'm sure you'll find we had more points in us and a better winning percentage with Monaghan/Burns as our halves then any other combination.

And i'm also sure we were sitting 2nd after nearly 2/3 of the season?

 

[Fluffy]

take out the 3 monas wins and we would not be

 

[fLIP]

He won them on his own did he fluffy?

 

[Nutzcraw]

[quote author=Nutzcraw]
Do this...


Have a look at Manly's halves combination for the last 4 years... I'm sure you'll find we had more points in us and a better winning percentage with Monaghan/Burns as our halves then any other combination.

And i'm also sure we were sitting 2nd after nearly 2/3 of the season?
[/quote]

Ok genius,

What combination has got us to 2nd??

 

[fLIP]

What combination has got us to 2nd??

In each of Manly's game this season, there have been 4 different combinations used.

Those being:

Orford + Lyon
Orford + Burns
Monaghan + Burns
Orford + Monaghan

Of these combinations the following number of games have been won:

Orford + Lyon - 5 Wins / 7 Games
Monaghan + Burns - 4 Wins / 4 Games
Orford + Burns - 2 Wins / 3 Games
Orford + Monaghan 0 Wins / 1 Game

Of each member of the 3 winning halves combinations:

Orford - 7 Wins / 11 Games
Burns - 6 Wins / 7 Games
Lyon - 5 Wins / 7 Games
Monaghan - 4 Wins / 5 Games

 

[Nutzcraw]

Can I be annoying and ask how many games these combinations have played this year?

 

[fLIP]

There you go, look up.

 

[Nutzcraw]

Where'd you get the stats from, flip?

I wanna check something and if my womans intuition is correct I'll post the findings.

:lol: and 8|

 

[fLIP]

live.rleague.com

 

[fLIP]

Also, you better fess up your womanly thoughts so I can rub it in when you are wrong 😉

 

[Nutzcraw]

I already stated it.. that I think we have a better FOR when monas/burns are our halves and a better winning percentage than any other combo we have had in recent years.

 

[fLIP]

Yeah, the problem with that, and the stats I provide is that they aren't quite comparible.

What I mean is you can look at Moanghan as say he has won 4 from 5 games this year in the halves and then look at orford and say he only won 7 from 11.

The problem arrises from Moanghan not having the same number of games and therefore reducing his chances of failure.

The same goes for points f/a with combos.

You can't compare a havles combo from 4 games to that of any other combo more than that many game accurately.