3rd Party Deals to be increased from 3 per team to 10

Berkeley_Eagle

Current Status: 24/7 Manly Fan
Clubs divided on Cap
3rd Party Deals to be increased from 3 per team to 10

Brent Read | March 06, 2008

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...012431,00.html

THE NRL will today face a backlash from several clubs over its plans to retain third-party agreements rather than raise the salary cap by $150,000.

In a move destined to split the clubs down the middle, the NRL is ready to soften the rules regarding TPAs, presently used by a minority of the 16 teams.

Under the guidelines, each club is allowed to pay three of its elite players $50,000 each from existing sponsors.

The NRL had proposed scrapping that system and rolling the $150,000 into the cap.

However, NRL chief executive David Gallop confirmed yesterday the league wanted to keep the TPA system and make it easier for its clubs to access them to boost player salaries.

The move is likely to draw condemnation from a number of clubs, including Canberra and Manly.

Others, such as Brisbane and the Sydney Roosters, are fans of the existing system.

The NRL sent clubs a discussion paper on the TPAs recently and it is understood they were split down the middle over whether they should be scrapped.

"The responses were reasonably divided," Gallop said.

Brisbane chief executive Bruno Cullen was among the eight chief executives whose club voted in favour of retaining the TPA system.

Cullen believes the existing system allows clubs to bring more money into the game without putting a strain on their salary cap.

The alternate view, such as that of Manly chief executive Grant Mayer, points out that the TPA system makes for an uneven playing field because some clubs can't access that money.

"I guess the issue is you have to have a level playing field," Mayer said.



http://www.leaguehq.com.au/news/news...402557452.html

.....
Meanwhile, NRL clubs will today be offered a compromise to the unpopular third-party agreements.
NRL boss David Gallop confirmed he would make a recommendation at a clubs' CEO conference to soften the regulations on third-party agreements. Under the proposal, the top 10 players at a club would be entitled to a marquee player allowance, rather than three.
 
well looks like its going to be the same 3 or 4 clubs at the top in a few years time from then on. everyone else is screwed

this will kill league
 
I agree Fluffy. Most clubs would kill to pick up 500k (10 x 50k) of sponsorship and all of a sudden they are supposed to get it for what I would imagine is a poor method of sponsors gaining recognition. How many player names 'proudly sponsored by...' is anyone willing to listen to on game day or any other time. They may as well just say that this proposal is proudly sponsored and supported by the Thoroughbreds and Broncos.
 
Might get to the stage where players have to change their names by deed poll each season.

Jetstar passes to Kmart who floats a beautiful pass to Dunlop who steps around Telstra and scores 
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

2025 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Raiders 21 17 0 4 168 38
2 Storm 20 15 0 5 248 36
3 Bulldogs 19 14 0 5 122 34
4 Panthers 20 12 1 7 119 31
5 Warriors 19 12 0 7 26 30
6 Broncos 20 11 0 9 104 28
7 Sharks 20 12 0 8 43 28
8 Dolphins 19 10 0 9 171 26
9 Roosters 19 9 0 10 20 24
10 Sea Eagles 20 9 0 11 -10 24
11 Tigers 20 8 0 12 -121 22
12 Dragons 19 7 0 12 -58 20
13 Cowboys 20 7 1 12 -177 19
14 Knights 20 6 0 14 -152 18
15 Eels 19 6 0 13 -153 18
16 Titans 19 5 0 14 -153 16
17 Rabbitohs 20 6 0 14 -197 16
Back
Top Bottom