Mata, the Licensing police were never called to give evidence, nor any staff member of the Wharf bar. Â There was CCTV footage of Brett walking through the Wharf bar and slipping. Â The Prosecutor attempted to infer that this was evidence of intoxication, but the Judge laughed this away. Â There was also coverage of when the players sort of 'conga dancing behind the bar, although Brett did not appear on this clip. Â There was no evidence put forward that Brett was asked to leave the Wharf bar. Â He was asked to leave the Steyne Hotel however later in the evening when he walked there with three or four others, including the young girl from the club. Â On the way there he was stopped on the Corso by a fan and talked footie with her and her kid. Â The Steyne security guy said that Brett spilt a small bit of beer and as the Hotel was under scrutiny from the LP, they were just being careful. Â He didn't say that Brett was intoxicated. Â There was CCCTV coverage of Brett and his brother standing outside waiting for a cab. Â Members of the public walked past, nothing untoward happened. Â The cab driver said that Brett eyes rolled and he thought he was a little drunk. Â He did not know that Brett was a diabetic and stated he got out of the cab, paid the fare and waited while the cab turned before walking across the road. Â Not the actions of a drunk person one would think. Â During the police testimony no police said that Brett was intoxicated. Â They all stated in their evidence that he carried on conversations with them about footie and the clubs ructions. Â
And what's all this 'semi' reliable stuff? Â I'm totally reliable. Â Â Â Â Â Â