Dan link said:
[quote author=Matabele link=topic=178793.msg201200#msg201200 date=1223934206]
Just thank your lucky stars you're not employed in a frivilous service industry. That's where the winds of despair will blow hardest.Â
A corporate that sells to the education sector
🙂 I am safe for a while. even looking at the jobs available I should be able to pick some work up for only a slight pay hit up here, I just really like the company I work for, and they are not the sort of company who get rid of high performing staff. I am a little worried about Leanne but as long as she doesn't fall pregnant or lose her job we will make ends meet. I can always grab a second job at Bunnings or something too
[/quote]Â As I said, your connection to the education sector will probably see you through.
Mind you, I'm already seeing some of the larger multi-nationals shedding the staff that they have in their development and expansion areas. Which means a lot of the big guys are going to batten down hatches and spend the next few years consolidating.Â
Back in 1990 when I was doing my Economics degree we looked at the Bell Curve - the relationship between inflation and unemployment. In early '91 they briefed us extensively on inflationary issues. When we hit the workforce (those of us lucky enough to get a job anyway) the issue was unemployment. The pendulum tipped very heavily in the space of 6 months and unemployment was a ngithmare for the next 4 years - peaking at 12% around 1994.
The problem with the current scenario is we're not just looking at a slowdown and job losses. We're also facing big problems with commodity scarcity. Stagflation could be the result.
I don;t subscribe to the imminent collpase theory, but I don't go along with the cyclic economists who are still rather sanguine. They're only sanguine because they have job security.
I think there are some very hard times ahead for the next 5 years that will test the resilience of the human condition.Â