Wolfpack link said:Don't understand the hatred for the bloke, not like he left us on bad terms. In fact if he had been retained I'd wager that most on this forum would be bagging him for his so-so defense.
The bloke left for a substantial pay rise, most of us would do the same if the offer was on the table. My long winded point is that there are other Rooster's players far more deserving of our scorn.
mozgrame link said:Agreed, but i still have a soft spot for Burns.
Matabele link said:How about the shocker Bani had for the Cowgirls this week? JWH, Burns, Bani - all good examples of dross we manage to offload to other NRL outfits.
This post was not a we hate Jared thing - more the fact he pretended he would belt us up - which imo was far from anything i seen. To be honest i like his enthusiasm but lots of the tough stuff in his game is niggle & grubby stuff - he will come good & maybe 1 day truly be the intimidator he talks himself up to be - just wasn't against the Seaeagles.Wolfpack link said:Don't understand the hatred for the bloke, not like he left us on bad terms. In fact if he had been retained I'd wager that most on this forum would be bagging him for his so-so defense.
The bloke left for a substantial pay rise, most of us would do the same if the offer was on the table. My long winded point is that there are other Rooster's players far more deserving of our scorn.
King link said:Does anyone else think JWH looks like he is playing underweight? I reckon he has lost close to 10kg and it has affected the way he plays.
DSM5 link said: If they were any good we would have kept them. Same with Orford.  Â
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
8 | 7 | 1 | 109 | 16 | |
8 | 7 | 1 | 56 | 16 | |
8 | 6 | 2 | 66 | 14 | |
8 | 5 | 3 | 51 | 12 | |
9 | 5 | 3 | 37 | 11 | |
9 | 5 | 4 | 95 | 10 | |
9 | 5 | 4 | 42 | 10 | |
8 | 4 | 4 | 25 | 10 | |
9 | 5 | 4 | -14 | 10 | |
9 | 4 | 5 | -16 | 8 | |
9 | 4 | 5 | -19 | 8 | |
8 | 3 | 5 | -55 | 8 | |
9 | 4 | 5 | -70 | 8 | |
9 | 3 | 5 | 11 | 7 | |
8 | 2 | 6 | -63 | 6 | |
8 | 1 | 7 | -89 | 4 | |
8 | 1 | 7 | -166 | 4 |