How to beat an NRL stitchup.

Yep. It was shaping as another Newcastle rort.
Everything the Tits did paid off; five tries from kicks; one-way penalties and set restarts.
Possession 71% to 29%.
Then the possession reversed.
What about that no try ruling against Turbo when the Bunker claims he didn't get the ball down? The Tits player should have been sin-binned for a professional foul. If it was no try then it must have been a penalty try. It has got to be the most incorrect ruling in the history of the Bunker.
 
Yep, take it completely out of the corrupt ref's hands & deal out a thrashing to the impudent team who benefitted from the first half corruption.
 
Yep. It was shaping as another Newcastle rort.
Everything the Tits did paid off; five tries from kicks; one-way penalties and set restarts.
Possession 71% to 29%.
Then the possession reversed.
What about that no try ruling against Turbo when the Bunker claims he didn't get the ball down? The Tits player should have been sin-binned for a professional foul. If it was no try then it must have been a penalty try. It has got to be the most incorrect ruling in the history of the Bunker.
I wonder if Annesley will mention this in his weekly dribble session.

He may be too busy lifting up the carpet and getting his broom.
 
Yep. It was shaping as another Newcastle rort.
Everything the Tits did paid off; five tries from kicks; one-way penalties and set restarts.
Possession 71% to 29%.
Then the possession reversed.
What about that no try ruling against Turbo when the Bunker claims he didn't get the ball down? The Tits player should have been sin-binned for a professional foul. If it was no try then it must have been a penalty try. It has got to be the most incorrect ruling in the history of the Bunker.
agreed totally - penalty try - professional foul
 
Just saw the Tom no try again and it seems he lost control of the ball before he even grounded it. Evidence attached. Also the Garrick one it did look like he got the last touch after the titan player touched it.

For me it was more the 6 again in the first half that the Titans kept getting and we didn’t get the same even though the Titans kept holding on. Maybe there is a Manly loading factor on the 6 agains.
 

Attachments

  • 59A6CFCC-2407-4292-AC57-95DB520B9254.jpeg
    59A6CFCC-2407-4292-AC57-95DB520B9254.jpeg
    122.6 KB · Views: 47
Yep. It was shaping as another Newcastle rort.
Everything the Tits did paid off; five tries from kicks; one-way penalties and set restarts.
Possession 71% to 29%.
Then the possession reversed.
What about that no try ruling against Turbo when the Bunker claims he didn't get the ball down? The Tits player should have been sin-binned for a professional foul. If it was no try then it must have been a penalty try. It has got to be the most incorrect ruling in the history of the Bunker.
100% penalty Try, if Sami wasn't there Tom gets that down no doubt
 
Just saw the Tom no try again and it seems he lost control of the ball before he even grounded it. Evidence attached. Also the Garrick one it did look like he got the last touch after the titan player touched it.

For me it was more the 6 again in the first half that the Titans kept getting and we didn’t get the same even though the Titans kept holding on. Maybe there is a Manly loading factor on the 6 agains.
59A6CFCC-2407-4292-AC57-95DB520B9254.jpeg.jpg

Tom lost it but this bloke is offside and affected the lost ball. If he isn't there Tom scores that easy.
 
100% penalty Try, if Sami wasn't there Tom gets that down no doubt
And I have no doubt Atkin was going to send him to the bin, he called Fogarty over and was going to send Sami, then the bunker got in Atkins ear and said penalty only, again that’s BS, it’s a penalty try first, if not, it’s definitely a professional foul and in the bin. Looking forward to hear how it gets explained.
 
Atkins refereed one team in the first half and I feared another Newcastle with his rulings. Manly took the game by the scruff of the neck after half time and he was not a problem.

The decision to disallow Tom's try was a howler and the other decision not to bin the blatantly offside Titans player bewildering!
 
And I have no doubt Atkin was going to send him to the bin, he called Fogarty over and was going to send Sami, then the bunker got in Atkins ear and said penalty only, again that’s BS, it’s a penalty try first, if not, it’s definitely a professional foul and in the bin. Looking forward to hear how it gets explained.

Exactly! Sami 100% should have been in the bin.

Naturally, the corrupt, Manly hating Klein made sure that didn't happen.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

2025 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Raiders 21 17 0 4 168 38
2 Storm 20 15 0 5 248 36
3 Bulldogs 20 15 0 5 140 36
4 Panthers 20 12 1 7 119 31
5 Warriors 20 12 0 8 8 30
6 Broncos 20 11 0 9 104 28
7 Sharks 21 12 0 9 35 28
8 Dolphins 20 10 0 10 119 26
9 Roosters 20 10 0 10 72 26
10 Sea Eagles 20 9 0 11 -10 24
11 Dragons 20 8 0 12 -50 22
12 Tigers 20 8 0 12 -121 22
13 Eels 20 7 0 13 -152 20
14 Cowboys 21 7 1 13 -178 19
15 Knights 20 6 0 14 -152 18
16 Rabbitohs 21 7 0 14 -195 18
17 Titans 20 5 0 15 -155 16
Back
Top Bottom