PONTIAN SEA EAGLE
Bencher
If brooks passing game is on we’ll go a long way if he runs the ball more we’ll win.
Yep, whatever happens, he's had a great first year as a Sea Eagle.Win or lose, he’ll be giving it everything, no doubt.
I think it was when I watched the replay on 9.Yep, whatever happens, he's had a great first year as a Sea Eagle.
My two concerns were his durability and his defence. And not only has he been one of our better defenders, he's the only player on the roster who hasn't missed a game this year. He's been great quality and great value, and a real positive addition to the team as a whole.
He can throw a no look pass too...Shoe who???..hahahaI think it was when I watched the replay on 9.
They said he’s the only Manly player to play every minute of every game this season, that was another two uppercuts I had to give myself after the things I said about him when I realised we actually signed him for real. But very happy to be wrong. Defence and durability were my two worries as well.
I think teddy & co got one over Brooks last game... so it's time to return serve!Before and after the game you couldn’t wipe the smile off him. You reckon he hadn’t played finals before! The first 15 minutes I think he was the dominant half. A cpl of close up shots of him at the scrum base and his eyes were as big as dinner plates. No doubt he had the adrenaline coursing through him.
You just knew he was thinking, "this could be my one and only finals game. I’m not fking around. I’m going all-in straight up!" (Well that was my take on his thoughts anyway 😉 ).
How bloody hard do you think he’s going to go against his former house-mate, and still his best mate Tedesco. I reckon he’ll be all over Teddie from the get-go. And he’ll be smacking down Keary at every chance. Win or lose, he’ll be giving it everything, no doubt.
Did he ever play at hooker towards the end of his stint with the Tigers?According to SMH he may transition to hooker, to permit Walsh in the 17 full-time. I wonder if that's what will occur today?
He did play a bit of hooker at Tigers. Not sure how well. I reckon he could also play a link role like Dylan Walker.Did he ever play at hooker towards the end of his stint with the Tigers?
Not this nonsense again....We have Simpkin who's bread and butter is hooker, and now we are doing this makeshift hooker business again.According to SMH he may transition to hooker, to permit Walsh in the 17 full-time. I wonder if that's what will occur today?
I thought Simpkins’ communication was a bit off today. Runners didn’t seem to know who was expecting to receive the ball from him (eg; Lodge’s knock on late).Not this nonsense again....We have Simpkin who's bread and butter is hooker, and now we are doing this makeshift hooker business again.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Raiders | 23 | 19 | 0 | 4 | 186 | 44 |
2 | Storm | 24 | 17 | 0 | 7 | 212 | 40 |
3 | Bulldogs | 23 | 16 | 0 | 7 | 138 | 38 |
4 | Broncos | 24 | 15 | 0 | 9 | 172 | 36 |
5 | Sharks | 23 | 14 | 0 | 9 | 91 | 34 |
6 | Warriors | 23 | 14 | 0 | 9 | 22 | 34 |
7 | Panthers | 23 | 12 | 1 | 10 | 87 | 31 |
8 | Roosters | 23 | 12 | 0 | 11 | 102 | 30 |
9 | Dolphins | 23 | 11 | 0 | 12 | 87 | 28 |
10 | Sea Eagles | 23 | 11 | 0 | 12 | 20 | 28 |
11 | Cowboys | 24 | 9 | 1 | 14 | -146 | 25 |
12 | Tigers | 23 | 9 | 0 | 14 | -127 | 24 |
13 | Eels | 23 | 9 | 0 | 14 | -132 | 24 |
14 | Rabbitohs | 23 | 9 | 0 | 14 | -151 | 24 |
15 | Dragons | 23 | 8 | 0 | 15 | -110 | 22 |
16 | Knights | 23 | 6 | 0 | 17 | -244 | 18 |
17 | Titans | 23 | 5 | 0 | 18 | -207 | 16 |