You make some fair points, but I think you’re still overplaying it massively. Every halfback can have games where they go quiet or get exposed defensively, especially against the top sides. The difference is DCE has had far more of those games than Fogarty over the years. Singling out Fogarty for two games out of a season where his team finished first is clutching at straws.Doesn’t get rattled? He went missing in Mudgee with the game on the line and again on the weekend. Also, those stats are weighed slightly in Daly’s favour if you tally them all up. If anything, achieving similar statistical feats in a beaten side, is more remarkable than doing so in a successful side. It’s easier to have success when success is around you. Most players have their best seasons when their team is firing. My guess is DCE would thrive behind that superior Raiders pack. But it’s all hypothetical so does not really matter what I think.
Interestingly, a few people have jumped to the defence of Fog after my appraisal of his game on the weekend (particularly where speed and defence is concerned, but seems a couple of league experts agree: Cronk calls out Ricky Stuart's massive mistake that played into Reece Walsh's hands
Cronk and Johns both pointed out the failure of Canberra's right-side defence in shutting Walsh and the Broncos down. Johns said: "You could see that right side defence with Fogarty and Timoko, they were really struggling together in combination."
Champion former halfback Cronk said Walsh and the Broncos clearly identified Canberra's No.7 as the opposition player to target when they attacked down the left. "Fogarty couldn't move with the speed of Reece Walsh to make it three on three, that's what made the indecision for (Jed) Stuart."
Also, don’t forget that we’ve had one of the worst right-edge defences in the comp for years now — and that comes primarily down to DCE and his defensive approach. His reads are erratic, he often rushes in with no communication, leaves Haumole stranded in no man’s land, and the centre (usually Garrick) ends up looking like the one to blame. The lack of cohesion on our right side has been a glaring issue that opposition teams have targeted for a long time. So if you’re going to bag Fogarty out for being caught a couple of times this season, then you’ve got to acknowledge the same thing with DCE. Otherwise, it’s just not a fair or balanced take.
And yeah, I watched the Raiders v Broncos game — no denying Fogarty got burnt, but Walsh is one of the hardest players in the comp to contain when he’s on. He almost single-handedly dragged Brisbane back into that match. Even the best defensive units get carved up by him.
On the “rattled and spooked” point, I was clearly talking about DCE — the headless chook routine he serves up week after week, running figure eights or circles because he refuses to take on the line or get tackled. That’s been a huge issue for us in attack for years, and it’s exactly why a composed half like Fogarty will be a breath of fresh air.
On the “it’s more impressive to do it in a beaten side” argument — I don’t buy that at all. Fogarty is literally one of the main reasons Canberra went from 9th last year to 1st this year. He played 23 games this season compared to just 14 last year due to injury, and you can see the difference his control and consistency made to the team. That’s not him riding on the back of success — that’s him creating it.
At the end of the day, I know you’re a big DCE fan, so I don’t expect you to change your mind. But making a reactionary call based on one game this year doesn’t line up with how Fogarty’s actually played across the season. If you’d watched him week to week, you’d see his defence is usually solid, his reads are good, and he brings the consistency and control Manly have been crying out for.
Last edited: