Pat Condell, hello angry Christians

[Dan]

what is a point?

 

[Matabele]

when Dan reaches the point of being incapable of justifying one of his outlandish statements of "fact" he starts a circular argument about who needs to justify what in the hopes the original discussion goes away

 

[Dan]

Are you giving it all you have Scottie?

 

[Matabele]

you tell me. you know everything.

 

[Dan]

Do I?

 

[Matabele]

so you allege

 

[Dan]

what do I allege?

 

[fLIP]

This is like the battle for the Gaza strip.

Can you guys remember what it is your arguing about anymore? :lol:

 

[Dan]

Is that a question?

 

[Matabele]

Can you guys remember what it is your arguing about anymore? :lol:

of course

There was no man who died on a cross and rose from the dead, just a pretty story to re-enforce that death need not be the end!

 

[Dan]

The perect business.

It is all in the entire post in context.

Can you read?

 

[Matabele]

justification

 

[fLIP]

Well you can't just pick an choose which parts of the bible are story and which aren't.

If Genesis by your own admission is not fact than what makes the Bible fact when speaking of Jesus?

 

[Matabele]

Flip, do you understand there are 66 "portions" of the Bible split into several literary genres?

 

[fLIP]

Yes I do know that. But why are some true and other just stories?

 

[Matabele]

erm, it's a little bit like asking why Aesop's fables are "stories" with an obvious point and why a text book is a text book.

 

[Dan]

but don't you follow the teachings of christ?

If parts of Jesus life are a story rather than truth what of what he said is a story of a story?

I mean Dr suess has a meaning too I better follow that blindly

 

[Matabele]

Is the whole bible about Christ?