Loobs
Living in the demountable.
I know the Sporting News is garbage but this is especially weak - from Bulldog's Bite;
CRITICISM OF COOPER CRONK SO FAR LACKING
This isn’t about bagging a champion. Let me make that crystal clear from the outset.
But it is still a column I think should be written.
Would former playmaker Mitchell Pearce have attracted criticism by leading a powerful Roosters side to four losses in the opening eight games?
The answer is, unequivocally, yes. Jumped all over.
Has Cooper Cronk come under the same scrutiny? The same dissection? The answer is no.
Cronk is a true champion, one of the finest halfbacks of the modern era.
But he has managed to avoid any intense cross-examination so far this year – unlike his predecessor Pearce.
Cronk has played his entire career in an AFL-mad town where NRL players aren’t essentially questioned or challenged.
But this is Sydney and rugby league rules.
Cronk’s form season so far has been modest. Yes, he is new to the club and, yes, his forwards haven’t excelled.
But he is a $1m a year player and Roosters fans would have expected more. I think even Cronk would have expected more.
No doubt I will get bagged for even daring to question Cronk. Bit like those who had the temerity to query Johnathan Thurston’s form this season.
The Roosters attack looks clunky and Cronk through periods of games has been largely ineffectual.
As I stressed, this isn’t about taking a pot shot at Cronk. It’s more about asking some questions and rationally analysing Cronk’s form.
And feeling a little for the often maligned Pearce, who would have been condemned if still in charge at Bondi.
Jesus H Christ this is a weak attempt at saying Cronk is playing ****. 3/4's of it is him tiptoeing around wanting to say he's been crap. The rest is him apologising for even bringing it up. This is why league journalism is so horrendous. Everyone is afraid to have an honest take, lest they offend one of the boys club.
That is of course unless they play for Manly. Then they feel the wrath of anyone with an audience...
CRITICISM OF COOPER CRONK SO FAR LACKING
This isn’t about bagging a champion. Let me make that crystal clear from the outset.
But it is still a column I think should be written.
Would former playmaker Mitchell Pearce have attracted criticism by leading a powerful Roosters side to four losses in the opening eight games?
The answer is, unequivocally, yes. Jumped all over.
Has Cooper Cronk come under the same scrutiny? The same dissection? The answer is no.
Cronk is a true champion, one of the finest halfbacks of the modern era.
But he has managed to avoid any intense cross-examination so far this year – unlike his predecessor Pearce.
Cronk has played his entire career in an AFL-mad town where NRL players aren’t essentially questioned or challenged.
But this is Sydney and rugby league rules.
Cronk’s form season so far has been modest. Yes, he is new to the club and, yes, his forwards haven’t excelled.
But he is a $1m a year player and Roosters fans would have expected more. I think even Cronk would have expected more.
No doubt I will get bagged for even daring to question Cronk. Bit like those who had the temerity to query Johnathan Thurston’s form this season.
The Roosters attack looks clunky and Cronk through periods of games has been largely ineffectual.
As I stressed, this isn’t about taking a pot shot at Cronk. It’s more about asking some questions and rationally analysing Cronk’s form.
And feeling a little for the often maligned Pearce, who would have been condemned if still in charge at Bondi.
Jesus H Christ this is a weak attempt at saying Cronk is playing ****. 3/4's of it is him tiptoeing around wanting to say he's been crap. The rest is him apologising for even bringing it up. This is why league journalism is so horrendous. Everyone is afraid to have an honest take, lest they offend one of the boys club.
That is of course unless they play for Manly. Then they feel the wrath of anyone with an audience...