1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Poor Melbourne

Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by Matabele, Sep 17, 2005.

  1. Matabele

    Matabele Well-Known Member

    +511 /14
    They have to start tonight's game with that useless poweder puff Ian Donnelly at prop. Partnering no-name White.

    I reckon you'd rather have Mullane at halfback ahead of Orford than have to start with that useless lump of lard.

    Expect the Storm pack to go backwards at a rate of knots and Orford to struggle. Let's just hope he doesn't get injured.
  2. Matabele

    Matabele Well-Known Member

    +511 /14
    He's already managed to get in the way of a long cut out from Orford!
  3. ads

    ads Well-Known Member

    +29 /1
    Orford isnt playing well.

    A useless kick on the third, and a grubber with no chasers.
  4. Spuds Bodyguard

    Spuds Bodyguard Active Member

    Is it just me or did Orford look very Monaghanish tonight?
  5. Matabele

    Matabele Well-Known Member

    +511 /14
    I didn't see any circles.
  6. Ryan

    Ryan Well-Known Member

    +7,492 /342
    He could NEVER look that bad.
  7. Dan

    Dan Administrator Staff Member Administrator 2017 Tipping Competitor 2016 Tipping Competitor

    Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    +6,359 /94
    with this years form, i would prefer donnelly over king
  8. Spuds Bodyguard

    Spuds Bodyguard Active Member

    Not trying to defend him, as I too think Monaghan is ordinary, but Orford was flat tonight behind a soft forward pack and without another playmaker. Scott Hill went awol after the intercept and Orford was left to do everything.

    This should serve as a warning to Manly, not to Orford or Monaghan, but to the forwards, stand up and start to show a bit of ticker.
  9. Guest

    Guest Guest

    +0 /0
    There is only one half back who can look good behind a beaten pack and that isn't Orford or Monaghan.

    I agree that unless our pack can get some go forward happening next year then we are not going to get the best out of our backline.

    That means ballin and Dunley as hookers and Burns as 5/8.

Share This Page