Utility Player
Bencher
Exactly, if a TPA limit of say 1 million was applied to all clubs and all TPA's were registered with the NRL then the problem would be all but solved.
Probe into Third Party Endorsements
- Thread starter The Who
- Start date
-
We had an issue with background services between march 10th and 15th or there about. This meant the payment services were not linking to automatic upgrades. If you paid for premium membership and are still seeing ads please let me know and the email you used against PayPal and I cam manually verify and upgrade your account.
Exactly, if a TPA limit of say 1 million was applied to all clubs and all TPA's were registered with the NRL then the problem would be all but solved.
So, 180 or 360? Given that DCE's backflip seemed to contain a lot of 'spin' and a higher degree of difficulty than say, Greg Inglis' or James Tedesco's, I'm leaning towards a backflip 360.
I think NRL's biggest fear with limiting TPA's is that rival codes without similar limits in place might entice league players away.
I think a TPA limit could work if the NRL payed an annual 'top-up' or 'thanks for staying' amount to, say, the top fifteen 'marquee/elite' players, that was above the salary cap and TPA's and totally separated from who these players played for.
And to avoid any element of favouritism, I would have this list of elite players receiving this bonus being voted on annually by all the NRL coaches (with limits on voting for own players) for the following year.
They're too busy liking my posts.
| Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5 | 4 | 1 | 23 | 10 |
|
5 | 4 | 1 | 14 | 10 |
|
6 | 4 | 2 | 48 | 8 |
|
6 | 4 | 2 | 28 | 8 |
|
5 | 3 | 2 | 25 | 8 |
|
5 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 8 |
|
6 | 3 | 2 | 38 | 7 |
|
6 | 3 | 2 | 21 | 7 |
|
6 | 3 | 3 | 37 | 6 |
|
6 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 6 |
|
6 | 3 | 3 | -13 | 6 |
|
5 | 2 | 3 | -15 | 6 |
|
6 | 3 | 3 | -36 | 6 |
|
6 | 2 | 4 | -5 | 4 |
|
6 | 2 | 4 | -7 | 4 |
|
5 | 0 | 5 | -86 | 2 |
|
6 | 1 | 5 | -102 | 2 |
