Cross-Forum-Discussion Round 18 2023 Cross Forum Chat

  • We had an issue with background services between march 10th and 15th or there about. This meant the payment services were not linking to automatic upgrades. If you paid for premium membership and are still seeing ads please let me know and the email you used against PayPal and I cam manually verify and upgrade your account.
  • We have been getting regular requests for users who have been locked out of their accounts because they have changed email adresses over the lifetime of their accounts. Please make sure the email address under your account is your current and correct email address in order to avoid this in the future. You can set your email address at https://silvertails.net/account/account-details
Organix - BroncosHQ said:

**** this guy. His clarification clarified nothing. Just says that the first "charge down" was the 9 attempting to cover the ball, when he clearly was tackling the player.

"Not every incident is the same under the laws of the game"... what? Like, just get rid of the Bungler. If we were not putting every ****ing thing under the microscope we would he forced to take a **** decision as just a decision and move on. Annesley justifying all this crap post-game just ****s the game and the rules further.
I think the same. Get rid of his bs, get rid of the bunker overreach, just play the game
 
NRL360 would be unbearable to watch tonight after the news of players striking against the media.

That's basically their livelihood at stake.
 
That is not Sticky.

There's a few things in that audio that's a dead giveaway.

"There's 22 players in this squad".

"3 goals we gave up that quarter". Huh? Raiders were leading 8-6 at half time.

Ricky has been coaching longer than 16 years.

I don't think that's even a Rugby League coach. Different sport based on some of the things said.
 
Organix - BroncosHQ said:

**** this guy. His clarification clarified nothing. Just says that the first "charge down" was the 9 attempting to cover the ball, when he clearly was tackling the player.

"Not every incident is the same under the laws of the game"... what? Like, just get rid of the Bungler. If we were not putting every ****ing thing under the microscope we would he forced to take a **** decision as just a decision and move on. Annesley justifying all this crap post-game just ****s the game and the rules further.
I cannot stand Annesley, and l never have had any time for the prick, however I heard Tracey Badgers explanation at the time and she was correct.

My question for the useless prick, is what would have happened if that was a Melbourne player?

Just asking like.
 
Ever Hopeful - NZWarriors said:
The Sharks sit third on the ladder yet have no Origin players and just 2-3 borderline Kiwi reps.
And a soft as **** draw... same as last year.

They'll be bundled out again straight away
 

Latest posts

Team P W L PD Pts
8 7 1 109 16
8 7 1 56 16
8 6 2 66 14
8 5 3 51 12
9 5 3 37 11
9 5 4 95 10
9 5 4 42 10
8 4 4 25 10
9 5 4 -14 10
9 4 5 -16 8
9 4 5 -19 8
8 3 5 -55 8
9 4 5 -70 8
9 3 5 11 7
8 2 6 -63 6
8 1 7 -89 4
8 1 7 -166 4
Back
Top Bottom