Good question, i looked into it and it appears the decision was made by Dymock to take a role at the Sharks and appeared to have no bad blood, i am not so sure of his coaching ability which is surpring because he was an apprentice to Des Hasler when he took Canterbury to 2 grand finals, maybe what he learnt under Des isnt applicable to the current gameI need to ask the Kennel on your behalf
Why didnt you keep him ?
That would make sense, Des seems to struggle himself in the modern gameGood question, i looked into it and it appears the decision was made by Dymock to take a role at the Sharks and appeared to have no bad blood, i am not so sure of his coaching ability which is surpring because he was an apprentice to Des Hasler when he took Canterbury to 2 grand finals, maybe what he learnt under Des isnt applicable to the current game
The sad reality is that the former champion Manly players of the 06-13 era have no love for the club any more. The majority of them want nothing to do with their former employer for the way they were treated at the back end of their careers. I've spoken to a few of them over the years and there was an overwhelming realisation of betrayal across the board. The fact is that the Manly DNA is actually extinct. We, the fans, are its last remnants. It's very difficult for us to come to terms with thisWe need to bring through a young former Many player, ala Des in 2004 and let him rebuild. Possibly Ballin, but I am unsure who else may fit the bill.
They're also responsible for the product being put on the park. Ergo, no good forwards.Who puts the structure in place? The owners
Who accepts the mediocrity that we have become? The owners
Coaches, players come and go…
The fact Lodge is on our roster tells you all you need to know about the current culture of our club.like most threads on Silvertails, it’s the players OR the coach, not both! Why?
I see players that aren’t up to and they are the ones missing tackles and making poor reads. But a number of those players were recruited by the coach. He’s assembled a Dad’s Army forward pack and it’s getting owned most weeks.
The problem is a lot of the bog average footballers we’ve got, but they’re getting jerseys off our coach and it’s his job to get the best out of them; so it’s BOTH!
This squad is better(on paper) than Souths,arguably Canberra’s(forwards not so much)and those two teams are ahead of Manly and they are a far better squad than the Dragons and Tigers,yet they’re equal on points.Souths have had injuries to some of their very best players,but Auntie Wayne still gets them to play to a well structured,cohesive game planThere are some good judges on here who think results would be the same if Bellamy was coach, so I guess that means sacking Seibold is not the answer.
Good to see you back.There are some good judges on here who think results would be the same if Bellamy was coach, so I guess that means sacking Seibold is not the answer.
I think he is a serious contender. His coaching record is light years ahead of Anthony Siebold. Are you aware of his career record? There has been a lot of winning to go with his time on the Gold Coast.Come up with a serious contender,not failed coaches from other clubs 😂
If Bellamy was coach Id bet 3/4 of the players would be shipped off.There are some good judges on here who think results would be the same if Bellamy was coach, so I guess that means sacking Seibold is not the answer.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 11 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 74 | 20 |
2 | Warriors | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 18 |
3 | Storm | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 135 | 16 |
4 | Raiders | 11 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 64 | 16 |
5 | Sharks | 11 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 70 | 14 |
6 | Rabbitohs | 11 | 6 | 0 | 5 | -52 | 14 |
7 | Cowboys | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | -32 | 13 |
8 | Broncos | 11 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 42 | 12 |
9 | Sea Eagles | 11 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 18 | 12 |
10 | Dragons | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | -11 | 12 |
11 | Tigers | 11 | 5 | 0 | 6 | -54 | 12 |
12 | Dolphins | 12 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 42 | 10 |
13 | Roosters | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | -46 | 10 |
14 | Eels | 11 | 4 | 0 | 7 | -79 | 10 |
15 | Titans | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | -100 | 10 |
16 | Panthers | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | -2 | 9 |
17 | Knights | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | -74 | 8 |