Remember Jake is shifting to FR once Walker comes on, so we are actually playing 5 FRs already. I think you're right, if we could guarantee no injuries but the difference is still marginal. If a half, hooker, backrower or centre goes down then Lawton is more valuable by a country mile.Lawton is handy no doubt about it, but if he's only going to get 15-20 mins a game why would you give up a wrecking ball like Sipley?
Doesn't make sense to me, surely a bench of Walker-Keppie-Sipley-Paseka would make most teams shudder.
Where in the uk are you from dudeI'd go Lawton. I think Sipley needs to spend the off season working on his speed and fitness. I just worry about how quickly he can get back into the defensive line.
I live in warrington (Bozo's place of birth) but am from Widnes originally. Both massive rugby league areasWhere in the uk are you from dude
I grew up just outside Cardiff though was born in Bristol. Both rugby union heartlands… Never seen a league game before moving to Australia.I live in warrington (Bozo's place of birth) but am from Widnes originally. Both massive rugby league areas
3 starting middles and 3 on the bench. Too much in this era.Have to have Lawton imo
Most crucially as cover if Croker goes down, but he also provides edge backrow cover too, if we had Sipley then we have 2 starting middles and another 3 middles on the bench
I also like what he offers late out of dummy half if the game opens up a bit
It's amazing how little people know about RL in the UK outside of the traditional RL playing townsI grew up just outside Cardiff though was born in Bristol. Both rugby union heartlands… Never seen a league game before moving to Australia.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 74 | 14 |
2 | Storm | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 78 | 12 |
3 | Raiders | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 58 | 12 |
4 | Warriors | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | -4 | 12 |
5 | Broncos | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 78 | 10 |
6 | Cowboys | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | -10 | 10 |
7 | Sharks | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 39 | 8 |
8 | Sea Eagles | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 36 | 8 |
9 | Tigers | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 8 |
10 | Dragons | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | -8 | 8 |
11 | Rabbitohs | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | -44 | 8 |
12 | Dolphins | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 16 | 6 |
13 | Roosters | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | -52 | 6 |
14 | Titans | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -68 | 6 |
15 | Knights | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -74 | 6 |
16 | Eels | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -107 | 6 |
17 | Panthers | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -26 | 4 |