Not sure if something odd is happening with the quote function. But that quote named for me in @XV-1 's post, that is not a Me.That is what the SMH article says 🤔
Not sure if something odd is happening with the quote function. But that quote named for me in @XV-1 's post, that is not a Me.That is what the SMH article says 🤔
The unders is for their next contract, beginning 2027
It was reported extensively at the time that they took less to stay at Manly than what the Bulldogs offered.
IMO the so called Bulldogs offer was just to force Manly to pay more.
Quite strange Manly had to up the offer if the Turbos were accepting unders.
Makes DCE salary seem very good value considering he has missed like 6 games in 10 years.
Tommy misses double that every year.
That was where the discussion regarding drastically reducing contracts were to occur. The discussion was this year, for their next contract, which begins in 2027. Whether you think they should get a next contract, fair enough.Next contract FMD, surely you jest
That was where the discussion regarding drastically reducing contracts were to occur. The discussion was this year, for their next contract, which begins in 2027. Whether you think they should get a next contract, fair enough.
The problem is we will sign them for 800k and 600 k and it’ll be their actual value as they are playing pretty poorly but still be called “unders” because it’s significantly less than the last contracts.The unders is for their next contract, beginning 2027
Could be history making. And not in a good way.This article has been written by Seibold's manager to take some pressure off him for next year...... It certainly is setting expectations pretty low on who we can recruit because of our salary cap limitations as a results of the Urbos contracts. Next season will be another cracker ......
Exactly this - Plus 1 decent forward signing, combined with minimal injuriesSo the way I see it the chance for improvement next year lies in some young players breaking out.
Our stocks aren't bursting at the seems in the regard so not wildly optimistic.
Obviously that may change with medical retirements to any of Jake, Aloiai or Crokes.
2027 is the year though and we have a real opportunity to set ourselves up for success.
Need to made the right calls there.
Maybe the chance for improvement lies with the coach,what are the chances?So the way I see it the chance for improvement next year lies in some young players breaking out.
Our stocks aren't bursting at the seems in the regard so not wildly optimistic.
Obviously that may change with medical retirements to any of Jake, Aloiai or Crokes.
2027 is the year though and we have a real opportunity to set ourselves up for success.
Need to made the right calls there.
Not good ......Maybe the chance for improvement lies with the coach,what are the chances?
The media hate Manly. They are loving our present situation. The Seibold sympathy suits their anti Manly sentiment, knowing he will likely help dig a deeper hole.Seibold would be loving all this. Just more excuses he can hide behind. We are not a results driven business, we are an excuse driven business.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Raiders | 21 | 17 | 0 | 4 | 168 | 40 |
2 | Storm | 21 | 16 | 0 | 5 | 252 | 38 |
3 | Bulldogs | 21 | 15 | 0 | 6 | 120 | 36 |
4 | Warriors | 21 | 13 | 0 | 8 | 12 | 32 |
5 | Panthers | 21 | 12 | 1 | 8 | 115 | 31 |
6 | Broncos | 21 | 12 | 0 | 9 | 114 | 30 |
7 | Sharks | 22 | 13 | 0 | 9 | 67 | 30 |
8 | Roosters | 21 | 11 | 0 | 10 | 92 | 28 |
9 | Dolphins | 21 | 10 | 0 | 11 | 109 | 26 |
10 | Sea Eagles | 21 | 9 | 0 | 12 | -24 | 24 |
11 | Tigers | 21 | 9 | 0 | 12 | -107 | 24 |
12 | Dragons | 21 | 8 | 0 | 13 | -54 | 22 |
13 | Cowboys | 22 | 8 | 1 | 13 | -144 | 21 |
14 | Eels | 21 | 7 | 0 | 14 | -156 | 20 |
15 | Rabbitohs | 22 | 8 | 0 | 14 | -191 | 20 |
16 | Knights | 21 | 6 | 0 | 15 | -186 | 18 |
17 | Titans | 21 | 5 | 0 | 16 | -187 | 16 |