Smith Caught - New Grub Act
- Thread starter bob dylan
- Start date
Don’t worry they’re in full denial on the DT site.If this was Facebook, you could cue the Melbourne fans and Queenslander's leaping to his defence in 3, 2, 1.....
But this is Silvertails. Give this grub both barrel's people
Kentie will let rip - I think Paul has lost the plot a bit but its good because he is in anti-Storm mode.
Loobs
Living in the demountable.
It's Monday so wobbles will be in as well defending Scam...
Watching Smith closely the last few games, he is involved in a lot of tackles around the ruck, but depends on the big men to get them down and he joins in to smother in the tackle, slowing down the time for all defenders to get off the ball runner, therefore slowing down the play the ball. Some of his efforts are bordering on late tackles, the ball runner was already put to the ground and because he is thereabouts he just flops on top.
I too have noticed this. He is rarely involved in any heavy contact.
He has a licence to be third man in and slow down the ruck because Bellamy knows he will get away with it.
KOMORI
Born and bred an Eagle
We could call it “The Wingnut”... or even “The Cade Cust” heheheh
Watching the video feed.
1) it is against the rules for a player to talk to a ref after a penalty. Yet ONCE MORE sCam gets to have a whole conversation with the ref about the penalty.
2) The amount of times the ref say "mate" to sCam is sickening.
3) He will only get a warning letter about the incident.
4) The incredibly toothless and worthless MRC decided it wasn't worth further investigation. I guess because they suck.
5) FOUR times sCam was allowed to question the ref about the penalty.
1) it is against the rules for a player to talk to a ref after a penalty. Yet ONCE MORE sCam gets to have a whole conversation with the ref about the penalty.
2) The amount of times the ref say "mate" to sCam is sickening.
3) He will only get a warning letter about the incident.
4) The incredibly toothless and worthless MRC decided it wasn't worth further investigation. I guess because they suck.
5) FOUR times sCam was allowed to question the ref about the penalty.
sheridanstand78
First Grader
You imagine if scam tried that tactic in another era, he would have been belted into next week. The serial nigglers like him prevail! He is a deadset protected species protected by the elite who run our game. I truly hope that someone clobbers him before he retires!!
Loobs
Living in the demountable.
Ah, the classic Hindmarsh! The easiest way to rack up big tackle counts...
HappilyManly
Journey Man
https://au.sports.yahoo.com/amphtml...en-wing-tackle-goes-unpunished-062313823.html
Caught and released after a Turdie pash
Caught and released after a Turdie pash
Users who are viewing this thread
| Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
24 | 19 | 5 | 148 | 44 |
|
24 | 17 | 7 | 212 | 40 |
|
24 | 16 | 8 | 120 | 38 |
|
24 | 15 | 9 | 172 | 36 |
|
24 | 15 | 9 | 109 | 36 |
|
24 | 14 | 10 | 21 | 34 |
|
24 | 13 | 10 | 107 | 33 |
|
24 | 13 | 11 | 132 | 32 |
|
24 | 12 | 12 | 125 | 30 |
|
24 | 12 | 12 | 21 | 30 |
|
24 | 10 | 14 | -76 | 26 |
|
24 | 9 | 14 | -146 | 25 |
|
24 | 9 | 15 | -135 | 24 |
|
24 | 9 | 15 | -181 | 24 |
|
24 | 8 | 16 | -130 | 22 |
|
24 | 6 | 18 | -199 | 18 |
|
24 | 6 | 18 | -300 | 18 |