I'm no historian but I understand that the Penn family took full control of the Manly Sea Eagles in 2014.
Since that time our historically successful First Grade team has not made a grand final.
Co-incidence?
Yeah that was the day the music died for sure.Well it was they who made the "results driven business" decision to bring in an unqualified, inexperienced chair freak to coach the NRL side.
Seriously what were they thinking.
Yes.. and no. The exit strategy from the 2007-2013 ageing star team was a nightmare. It was more a football department issue, but I guess the owners have some say in that.I'm no historian but I understand that the Penn family took full control of the Manly Sea Eagles in 2014.
Since that time our historically successful First Grade team has not made a grand final.
Co-incidence?
Just not thinking Manly is a money making juggernaut that the Penn's can say they are making millions from.It pains me to admit it but our once great club that was almost always in contention for the highest honour is no longer. Private ownership has not worked on the field, although I imagine it's not hurt the Penns' finances.
We are now a middle ranking club, a suburban outfit battling the financial might of one-city clubs, clubs with endless poker machine revenues, and a club with a billionaire owner with more clout than a sledgehammer.
Manly. Just making up the numbers.
What Happens to my posts on here ?For anyone who wants to understand why I think that the club will never be long term successful under the Penn family have a read of this article
![]()
Wests Tigers financial shortfall covered for now … but that may not always be the case
The NRL joint venture club will ride out a series of payouts that hit the 2023 bottom line.www.smh.com.au
The days of losing money when owning a NRL club are long gone - basically you have to be incompetent to lose money (which is why the west tigers do)
What does this have to do with Manly?
Well ask yourself the question what is the incentive for the owners to invest more money in say membership staff when the potential return could be viewed as a risk? Why would the owners move home games to make more money? Why would they over invest in things like a local reserve grade team rather than co branded with Blacktown?
They were removed as they were nothing more than spam. There are no issues if you post something that is an opinion or a view but they did not add anything to the discussionWhat Happens to my posts on here ?
I thought in a forum every perspective has its point of view and mattersThey were removed as they were nothing more than spam. There are no issues if you post something that is an opinion or a view but they did not add anything to the discussion
I thought in a forum every perspective has its point of view and matters
The moral of my story ...
All lives Matter @Isz...... Blacks , Whites and Bozos 🙂
Bozo old son, bring it in tight: your posts are like a 33/45/78 record that has hit the end of the track/s and the stylus is now making that repetitive skipping noise, until you lift it off the record. You know, the same thing, over and over and over…I thought in a forum every perspective has its point of view and matters
The moral of my story ...
All lives Matter @Isz...... Blacks , Whites and Bozos 🙂
Views yesI thought in a forum every perspective has its point of view and matters
The moral of my story ...
All lives Matter @Isz...... Blacks , Whites and Bozos 🙂
Whilst this may be true, owning a professional sporting team gives credibility and brand value to his family businesses, all of which are based on weight loss, nutrition, etc. This is the primary reason the Penn family own a team. The fact that it is NRL, and Manly in particular, has just as much to do with affordability, as any 'love'/support for the club.I don’t like Penn even though I do not personally know the bloke. I doubt anyone on this site could claim to actually know him.
Based upon the same logic and or intuition I very much doubt his family’s intentions and overall involvement with the club is one based upon making more $! The Penns are entrepreneurial enough to obtain better returns putting their time and money elsewhere. There is obviously some kind of love for the club involved. Call it dysfunctional love if you wish.
Are you aware of their dealings with the leagues club?I don’t like Penn even though I do not personally know the bloke. I doubt anyone on this site could claim to actually know him.
Based upon the same logic and or intuition I very much doubt his family’s intentions and overall involvement with the club is one based upon making more $! The Penns are entrepreneurial enough to obtain better returns putting their time and money elsewhere. There is obviously some kind of love for the club involved. Call it dysfunctional love if you wish.
James I know you and I disagree a lot mate. But respectful on this one you are wrong. Max had done the heavy lifting in saving the club before pelican Penn came along.Yeah that was the day the music died for sure.
They were great in helping save the club,NO doubt but they just arnt rich enough or committed enough it seems to go the full monty ...... Says me who does jack all. Ironic yes
while they never seemed fully vested i think the salary cap rort and defence was just too big a hill to climb. I presume it cost a motza and apart from the des appeasment seem to have done nothing above the minimum requirement
Surely private ownership can secure more third party than we do
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 74 | 14 |
2 | Storm | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 78 | 12 |
3 | Raiders | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 58 | 12 |
4 | Warriors | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | -4 | 12 |
5 | Broncos | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 78 | 10 |
6 | Cowboys | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | -10 | 10 |
7 | Sharks | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 39 | 8 |
8 | Sea Eagles | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 36 | 8 |
9 | Tigers | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 8 |
10 | Dragons | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | -8 | 8 |
11 | Rabbitohs | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | -44 | 8 |
12 | Dolphins | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 16 | 6 |
13 | Roosters | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | -52 | 6 |
14 | Titans | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -68 | 6 |
15 | Knights | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -74 | 6 |
16 | Eels | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -107 | 6 |
17 | Panthers | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -26 | 4 |