Wolfpack said:SeaEagleRock8 said:Ridiculous assumption to make, and then to use that to decide Lowe was selfish? You must
He had health issues for a long time, after a year in the job you would think he would know whether he is cut out for another year or not. It just doesn't seem like something that has sprung up out of the blue. I'm just annoyed that we find ourselves without a CEO as we approach the middle of the season, a time when the clubs employees surely have enough on their plate as is.
Perhaps selfish was a poor choice of words, but I still think he should have made a call sooner.
Regarding the owners, yes I know that the in-fighting has been done for some time now. Lowe did his job in quelling that stoush & keeping it behind closed doors, well done to him. What I meant by my comment was that everyone knows that was what he was brought in for & as such when people think of Lowe the matter of the in-fighting usually pops up. Not saying he did a poor job of it at all.
From the report that said we may have someone already they are looking at, it seems Lowe advised the club at the start of the year that he was going and they have been looking for a replacement since. It's not in the club's best interests for Lowe just to leave and then we spend 3-4 months finding a replacement. What happens with Lowe and his job won't affect the way the players play. It wasn't like Mayer's depature. This was Lowe's call.