The Take on Jake

Better to overpay someone who puts in 100% every game(in the forwards department) than pay someone 50-70% of that whose efforts are inconsistent.

In saying that "if" Jake is on $900,000 he is probably overpaid by $200,000.

I'm not always a fan of the "family club" concept, yes it has it's obvious positives but i think the negatives in the long run out weigh the positives and can hamstrung the club in a variety of ways creating a prolonged downturn.
 
Players salaries aren't directly determined by how well they play, would be nice if they were but it's not reality. They're determined by what rival clubs are willing to pay them. If we tried to pay Jake $700k we would lose him to a club willing to pay more. I think the Turbos are priced just right, to fend off rival clubs offers.
 
Jake is tough and puts in each week.

He has a good offload, for some reason have not seen much of it, some sets he is just looking for a quick play the ball and looking for the next play rather than playing what’s in front of him.

I think Jake is an out and out Prop forward, we have such a good talent base of junior front rowers coming through, Titmus, Fainu and Tuitavake. Not sure if we will see Jake back in the front row for these reasons.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

2025 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Raiders 20 16 0 4 152 36
2 Storm 19 14 0 5 228 34
3 Bulldogs 19 14 0 5 122 34
4 Warriors 19 12 0 7 26 30
5 Panthers 19 11 1 7 83 29
6 Broncos 19 11 0 8 124 28
7 Sharks 20 12 0 8 43 28
8 Dolphins 19 10 0 9 171 26
9 Roosters 19 9 0 10 20 24
10 Sea Eagles 19 9 0 10 6 24
11 Dragons 19 7 0 12 -58 20
12 Tigers 20 8 0 12 -121 20
13 Cowboys 20 7 1 12 -177 19
14 Knights 19 6 0 13 -116 18
15 Eels 19 6 0 13 -153 18
16 Titans 19 5 0 14 -153 16
17 Rabbitohs 20 6 0 14 -197 16
Back
Top Bottom