www.foxsports.com.au
In the other thread it is Wadell to the dogs. Now Waddell going too??
Well if the contract is cheap and for depth its not a bad signing.. 3 years on the cheap for a squad player that has fg and finals experience
I personally am because he only plays well once every handful of games and outside of that he just gives away penalties and set restarts or is completely invisible. Last year he was ok although I reserved judgement because he disappeared on the field for most of the season except the few breakout games he had against canberra at brookie and I think the storm? More invisible this year, more vulnerable in defence and more clumsy, not the style of player we need.
What else could he say? You don't expect him to speak the truth, do you?
| Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bulldogs | 11 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 74 | 20 |
| 2 | Warriors | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 18 |
| 3 | Storm | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 135 | 16 |
| 4 | Raiders | 11 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 64 | 16 |
| 5 | Sharks | 12 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 44 | 14 |
| 6 | Rabbitohs | 11 | 6 | 0 | 5 | -52 | 14 |
| 7 | Cowboys | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | -32 | 13 |
| 8 | Broncos | 11 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 42 | 12 |
| 9 | Sea Eagles | 11 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 18 | 12 |
| 10 | Dragons | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | -11 | 12 |
| 11 | Roosters | 11 | 5 | 0 | 6 | -20 | 12 |
| 12 | Tigers | 11 | 5 | 0 | 6 | -54 | 12 |
| 13 | Dolphins | 12 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 42 | 10 |
| 14 | Knights | 11 | 4 | 0 | 7 | -55 | 10 |
| 15 | Eels | 11 | 4 | 0 | 7 | -79 | 10 |
| 16 | Titans | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | -100 | 10 |
| 17 | Panthers | 11 | 3 | 1 | 7 | -21 | 9 |
