Christol74
Reserve Grader
Below is a link to the last Warringah Council annual report. Please have a look at it and do a search in the document for Broovale Oval. If you were involved in the 'community consultation' process you would be aware that basically the only person involved that was against upgrading the Oval was a councilor (who should not have been involved without disclosing who they were).
There is only one thing mentioned in the annual report about the councils findings from the community consultation -
They also show how their performance measures up against KPI's and on the subject of Brookvale Oval they believe they have over achieved with the majority of residents satisfied with their management.Â
Here is their appraisal, the first number is their target, the second their actual.
As you can see, they believe the only things that need more work are Bike Paths and Walking Trails. Despite the fact they took money from the roads budget to build bike paths and received Federal funding for walking trails. Here are the results, the first number is the target, the second number the actual.
Here are four letters that I think they should include in this years KPI's- ACCC
Post automatically merged: [time]1301748620[/time]
Sorry, forgot the link-
http://www.warringah.nsw.gov.au/publications/documents/AnnualReport2010full.pdf
There is only one thing mentioned in the annual report about the councils findings from the community consultation -
Our analysis identified the following key themes of common
interest and/or concern for our community:
• Opposition to expenditure on Brookvale Oval
They also show how their performance measures up against KPI's and on the subject of Brookvale Oval they believe they have over achieved with the majority of residents satisfied with their management.Â
Here is their appraisal, the first number is their target, the second their actual.
Key Performance Indicators
KPI Unit - Target - Actual                          l
Residents satisfied with walking trails and tracks
Mean score Target - 6.74Â Actual - 6.65
Residents satisfied with bike paths
Mean score 5.32 4.92
Residents satisfied with management of street trees
Mean score 5.68 5.47
Residents satisfied with maintenance of beaches and rock pools
Mean score 7.25 7.48
Residents satisfied with Brookvale Oval
Mean score 5.85 5.89
Residents satisfied with sporting fields and amenities
Mean score 6.50 6.76
Residents satisfied with parks and recreation areas including
playgrounds Mean score 6.99 6.67
Residents satisfied with managing the impact of visitors to the area
Mean score 6.19 6.33
As you can see, they believe the only things that need more work are Bike Paths and Walking Trails. Despite the fact they took money from the roads budget to build bike paths and received Federal funding for walking trails. Here are the results, the first number is the target, the second number the actual.
Here are four letters that I think they should include in this years KPI's- ACCC
Post automatically merged: [time]1301748620[/time]
Sorry, forgot the link-
http://www.warringah.nsw.gov.au/publications/documents/AnnualReport2010full.pdf