Surely if the NRL had enough information and evidence to suspend brett for 4 weeks, fine the manly club, they did so on factual information. And if so I wonder why he wasnt called as a witness
You Know why
He had nothing, he's got nothing and there was nothing. but still the penalties are imposed. And still after his innocence is proven Nothing
Maybe his fact was based on Paul kent and Rebecca wilson's stories after all that all they were stories
You Know why
He had nothing, he's got nothing and there was nothing. but still the penalties are imposed. And still after his innocence is proven Nothing
Maybe his fact was based on Paul kent and Rebecca wilson's stories after all that all they were stories