He got the stuff...Stevo said:lolololllerskates
@[globaleagle] What are you on, man?!?
Daniel said:voicefromthehill said:The thread police! "Sir you have been caught with a commercial quantity of new threads concealed on your person, that's a 2 year ban!"
@[MK Eagle] would never again grace these boards
That would be just wrong. Seriously though, @[Daniel] is there a way to have a thread preview feature (beyond the the subject/heading)? It may save some people's obviously precious time
Thread preview could be a good idea actually, ill look into that
Stevo said:lolololllerskates
@[globaleagle] What are you on, man?!?
Daniel said:The train of thought is still open, therefore I didn't want to cut it off with a fullstop.
Dan79 said:WHEN will people learn to only create new threads when they have something unique to contribute. it is obvious that a game thread exists. Maybe that is a suitable place to ask the question
Sometimes in society there is too much freedom. Maybe it is time to limit new threads.
@Daniel
voicefromthehill said:mozgrame said:All these posts belong in the "Have a whinge" forum.
Have a whinge mate
voicefromthehill said:COMMANDER said:Sometimes in society there is too much freedom. Maybe it is time to limit new threads.
@Daniel
Lang lebe Hitler
Chip and Chase said:When.....
will I, will I be famous ????
Chip and Chase said:When.....
will I, will I be famous ????
voicefromthehill said:I can't answer
bones said:When.... will I.... see my picture in the papers?
Dan79 said:I am glad i got your attention
The reason for the post was pretty simple. New threads should be a new idea or new direction, most often unrelated to other threads, but obvious not always. The reason i believed this was a bad thread was 2 fold.
1. The thread title was far to broad. could have been related to anything.
2. There is a game thread created where this question could be asked. To me it seems common sense.
MK is a great example of a man that enjoys a new thread. But he is good at it. His threads are usually a different idea (could be a similar subject matter to existing). But it is different take. Importantly his first post is a discussion of at least 5 lines to generate further discussions.
Why else would moderator create 'super threads' to clear the clutter.
I may have been a little harsh on old mate, but i got you thinking.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7 | 6 | 1 | 54 | 14 | |
6 | 5 | 1 | 59 | 12 | |
6 | 4 | 2 | 53 | 10 | |
6 | 4 | 2 | 30 | 10 | |
7 | 4 | 2 | 25 | 9 | |
8 | 4 | 4 | 73 | 8 | |
7 | 4 | 3 | 40 | 8 | |
7 | 4 | 3 | 24 | 8 | |
7 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 8 | |
7 | 4 | 3 | -8 | 8 | |
8 | 4 | 4 | -60 | 8 | |
8 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 7 | |
6 | 2 | 4 | -31 | 6 | |
7 | 3 | 4 | -41 | 6 | |
7 | 2 | 5 | -29 | 4 | |
7 | 1 | 6 | -87 | 4 | |
7 | 1 | 6 | -136 | 4 |