The answer
Member
How come we gave up on Manu? I really thought he'd be a good buy, surly he couldnt have hurt the salary cap too much. 
Willie Manu
- Thread starter The answer
- Start date
I think we have had enough issues with 'bad eggss' in the past eg Andrew Walker, Hoppa etc.
Although he would have been a cheap replacement for Hecks, we solid role model at the club that don't have to be spoon fed.
I was watching an interview Leo Barry recently and he said Paul Roos and Swans have done a lot of work getting the right people with the right attitude at the club over the last few years and that contributed a lot to their success - they let talented palyers go because of their attitude and demeanour whether it is at training or during or after a game.
We should be gathering a team who have similar qualities, 1 bad apple can spoil a bunch and maybe Manu was too much of a risk.
Also why was Sam harris released? I heard he was a poor trainer at the Waratahs
Although he would have been a cheap replacement for Hecks, we solid role model at the club that don't have to be spoon fed.
I was watching an interview Leo Barry recently and he said Paul Roos and Swans have done a lot of work getting the right people with the right attitude at the club over the last few years and that contributed a lot to their success - they let talented palyers go because of their attitude and demeanour whether it is at training or during or after a game.
We should be gathering a team who have similar qualities, 1 bad apple can spoil a bunch and maybe Manu was too much of a risk.
Also why was Sam harris released? I heard he was a poor trainer at the Waratahs
The answer
Member
I just heard he finally did sign with castleford this morning 
CliffyIsGod
Bencher
I'd rather play a man down...
Users who are viewing this thread
Latest posts
2020 Ladder
| Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bulldogs | 10 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 110 | 20 |
| 2 | Warriors | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 18 |
| 3 | Raiders | 11 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 64 | 16 |
| 4 | Storm | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 135 | 14 |
| 5 | Sharks | 11 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 70 | 14 |
| 6 | Sea Eagles | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 38 | 12 |
| 7 | Rabbitohs | 11 | 6 | 0 | 5 | -52 | 12 |
| 8 | Cowboys | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | -32 | 11 |
| 9 | Broncos | 11 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 42 | 10 |
| 10 | Dragons | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | -11 | 10 |
| 11 | Roosters | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | -46 | 10 |
| 12 | Tigers | 11 | 5 | 0 | 6 | -54 | 10 |
| 13 | Panthers | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | -2 | 9 |
| 14 | Dolphins | 11 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 6 | 8 |
| 15 | Knights | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | -74 | 8 |
| 16 | Eels | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | -99 | 8 |
| 17 | Titans | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | -100 | 8 |