No Ben lillchip makes a good point - why would a glittering stand be erected at the wrong end of the ground to best watch rugby league, behind the posts and in this way attract new members? The Jane Try should either be upgraded OR this new stand should be built on the hill. i.e. alongside the pitch. It's not that hard to figure.Some people are just hard to please
Its a Centre Of Excellence with a grandstand out the front isn't it???.
I believe that is it, no corporate boxes, just a grandstand.
Why would you build the new prize stand at the end of the ground where it's the worst view of the game?
Can anyone explain why we wouldn't replace the hopelessly archaic Jane Try Stand?
I can explain it for you in one word, stupidity.
It will end up looking like that mish mash ground WIN Stadium down at the Gong, when they moved that mother of a grandstand from the Aquatic Centre down there when the Olympics finished in 2000, hardly anybody sits there even when the ground is packed, can't blame them though, why anybody would want to sit behind the goal posts is beyond me, but some still do.
Each to his own, I just find it hard to follow the actionWhats wrong with sitting behind the goalposts? Its a great spot for kids because they are up close to the tries and can try and catch the goals. Also a great spot for watching certain lines being run and its the best place to get an idea of defensive patterns.
If the COE is at the northern end then Beacon Hill has become Beacon FlatsSMH has this render which runs along the hill and extends off the existing stands. I assume in front they will maintain the grass as a seating area. That photo is from an article a week ago (https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/br...overnment-funding-pledge-20190208-p50wma.html).
I note in this thread it's propsed on the northern end: https://silvertails.net/threads/brookvale-upgrade-version-57.55822/
View attachment 10682
That is an old render from a study Warringah Council initiated the best part of a decade ago.SMH has this render which runs along the hill and extends off the existing stands. I assume in front they will maintain the grass as a seating area. That photo is from an article a week ago (https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/br...overnment-funding-pledge-20190208-p50wma.html).
I note in this thread it's proposed on the northern end: https://silvertails.net/threads/brookvale-upgrade-version-57.55822/
View attachment 10682
I believe the funding is first and foremost focused around the establishment of the Centre of Excellence. The addition of further grandstand seating is complimentary to the COE rather than the primary goal of the funding.
Does it have seats? I can't see seats!!!!!SMH has this render which runs along the hill and extends off the existing stands. I assume in front they will maintain the grass as a seating area. That photo is from an article a week ago (https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/br...overnment-funding-pledge-20190208-p50wma.html).
I note in this thread it's propsed on the northern end: https://silvertails.net/threads/brookvale-upgrade-version-57.55822/
View attachment 10682
Oh my - sorry but I would have assumed any funding to upgrade any part of Brookvale and to get a COE would be a positive. Certainly is in my books and given I would suggest the Club knows what they are doing - better than us - whatever project they put forward for funding had a very good rationale and was the very best proposal to try and leverage the funding. Do you think Lyall thought gee - lets ask for some funding - lots of funding but then lets put our proposal in so one it gives the club the worst possible outcome for the club and the fans with the stand in the worst possible place and also lets put in a proposal for funding that gives us the worst possible chance of success? This is all about the ability to leverage the funding - I have no idea what the final plan is or what they put forward but I am sure what the club pitched to the State Government did the job because they came to the party! So how about lets be positive - get behind the club and maybe take the view that Lyall and the club just might know what they are doing - yes even better than what us mug punters think is the right solution. Now that might be an innovative concept to some on here I gather!Why would you build the new prize stand at the end of the ground where it's the worst view of the game?
Can anyone explain why we wouldn't replace the hopelessly archaic Jane Try Stand?
This is my favourite - from a time they were expecting to receive about $2bn in funding for renos...That is an old render from a study Warringah Council initiated the best part of a decade ago.
It dates from the frisbee tournament era at Council chambers and is thus about five or six firm proposals and/or Joe Kelly-like ‘pie in the sky’ dream concepts ago.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 74 | 14 |
2 | Storm | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 78 | 12 |
3 | Raiders | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 58 | 12 |
4 | Warriors | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | -4 | 12 |
5 | Broncos | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 78 | 10 |
6 | Cowboys | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | -10 | 10 |
7 | Sharks | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 39 | 8 |
8 | Sea Eagles | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 36 | 8 |
9 | Tigers | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 8 |
10 | Dragons | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | -8 | 8 |
11 | Rabbitohs | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | -44 | 8 |
12 | Dolphins | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 16 | 6 |
13 | Roosters | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | -52 | 6 |
14 | Titans | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -68 | 6 |
15 | Knights | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -74 | 6 |
16 | Eels | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -107 | 6 |
17 | Panthers | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -26 | 4 |