christian life centre

[Matabele]

I conceded that *we* may not be able to prove the existence of God (unless we know everything there is to know).

However, that does not mean we cannot know if there is a god, does it Dan?

 

[Dan]

deary me matas, that is the definition of an agnostic.

the point was "we" can not prove the existence of a god!

by the way are you available ont he phone right now?

 

[Matabele]

yes we can sweety - because he chose to reveal himself. 😉

 

[Dan]

can you prove that?

 

[Fluffy]

yes we can sweety - because he chose to reveal himself. 😉

yeah i tried that once too, almost ended up in jail

 

[Fro]

ahhh but see the problem with coming in late fro is that you missed the original which matabele and I are still debating, his claim was initially that the existence of a god was provable by him.
He has since conceded.

now do you have any value to add or do you wish to just try and stir the pot, because you are swimming witht he masters of it here

Didnt come in late Dan, been watching the whole dreary thing, I have never said god was provable, and have never doubted you were agnostic. I believe both to be true without proof.

and no not stirring for the sake of it, Ive said a few times on the last couple of posts I wasnt arguing with you, but it appears you like to argue anyway.

 

[Dan]

nibble

 

[Fro]

As long as you kiss me before releasing Danny Boy 🙂