joelownsjared
Rookie
Deleted
Last edited:
Deleted
- Thread starter joelownsjared
- Start date
I wouldn’t be unhappy with a Suli extension the kid has heaps of upside!!
Just hope we can keep Kelly as well.
Just hope we can keep Kelly as well.
I prefer a happy ending, but a happy start is also good.
Are either lane or wacko jacko happy clappers?
Mate we were all horny buggers at his age and some still are .
KNUCKLES
Bencher
Jacko might like it from the backo??
KNUCKLES
Bencher
That's what I was thinking.. jacko likes it from the backo
ricardo
Bencher
I'm guessing it's either that AJ is homosexy or that his devout Christianity prevents him from viewing attractive naked girls.
NRL will suspend him if our club doesn’t. Playing for Manly won’t win him any favours from the media pressure we and he will cop.
yokahontas
Bencher
I believe he’s already entered a guilty plea, all the Section 32 stuff is about his lawyer asking for no conviction to be recorded. If the court accepts that, you’d have to think no more than a couple of weeks’ suspension, in line with what other players have received after a ‘no conviction recorded’ result in court. Pretty sure Corey Norman, for example, got a S.10 for one of his illicit substance escapades, and didn’t get much more than a slap on the wrist with a wet lettuce leaf from the NRL.
Bearfax
Grizzly old fart
You should clarify what Section 32 and 10 are Yoko. Sect 32 addresses Mental Health matters, Section 10 is being found guilty without conviction being recorded.
yokahontas
Bencher
Section 32 is just another way the courts can discharge a matter with ‘no conviction recorded’. There are heaps of them - S.9 and S.10 are the most well known, 9 being a good behaviour bond, 10 generally being the first/minor offence for a cleanskin. It’s kind of the court version of letting you off with a warning.
There seems to be a lot of confusion about what the ‘mental health’ thing actually means; it’s not a *defence* to a charge (I think people are seeing it as some sort of ‘diminished responsibility’ plea, which it’s not). It’s basically saying “yes, I did it, I take responsibility for it, but here is a mitigating factor for the court to consider when deciding the punishment”, that’s all. And S.32 covers everything from learning difficulties, anxiety, depression, autism spectrum disorder etc
I would suggest if there wasn’t something that gave Fainu the option of a discharge under S.32, they’d be asking for an S.10 (maybe a 9) anyway. Really the only difference is, if he has a diagnosis that fits
S.32 criteria, it’s a little bit more ‘evidence’ for no conviction to be recorded, whereas 10/9 is purely just ‘I’m a good boy/I promise I’ll be a good boy, please don’t record a conviction against me’.
yokahontas
Bencher
Yep, pretty much!
Users who are viewing this thread
Latest posts
2020 Ladder
| Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bulldogs | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 74 | 14 |
| 2 | Storm | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 78 | 12 |
| 3 | Raiders | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 58 | 12 |
| 4 | Warriors | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | -4 | 12 |
| 5 | Broncos | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 78 | 10 |
| 6 | Cowboys | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | -10 | 10 |
| 7 | Sharks | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 39 | 8 |
| 8 | Sea Eagles | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 36 | 8 |
| 9 | Tigers | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 8 |
| 10 | Dragons | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | -8 | 8 |
| 11 | Rabbitohs | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | -44 | 8 |
| 12 | Dolphins | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 16 | 6 |
| 13 | Roosters | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | -52 | 6 |
| 14 | Titans | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -68 | 6 |
| 15 | Knights | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -74 | 6 |
| 16 | Eels | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -107 | 6 |
| 17 | Panthers | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -26 | 4 |
