Garts said:Oh well. I would rather play out of Brookie with no hill than be forced to the SFS or ANZ.
sheridanstand78 said:We need Brooky to have a capacity all seated of 25K, if the capacity is to be cut to around 15 to 17 K , the club will die. I still think the inevitable outcoe will be a split of 6 games at Brooky and SFS, its a matter of time.
Yeah, every Sunday we can have something like a "speakers corner", where we can bring our soapboxes and talk about saving the spotted frog in Brookvale Valley.bones said:The plans include 'meeting spaces for the community'.
What a huge relief.
ManlyArmy said:All seater Eastern Stand is the way to go. Improves sustainability, corporate facilities, and we can still keep the northern hill. It would be good if the could connect the new Eastern Stand with the Fulton-Menzies Stand.
HappilyManly said:Wish they built a Northern Stand instead, connected to the Jane Try Stand.
It would stop the winter winds and have the same seating capacity as the eastern hill :idea:
The Who said:HappilyManly said:Wish they built a Northern Stand instead, connected to the Jane Try Stand.
It would stop the winter winds and have the same seating capacity as the eastern hill :idea:
I agree. I'd also like to see the existing stands improved and heightened to increase seating capacity before they touch the Hill.
It would be a sad day if the Hill was dug up, but if it is the only way that we get to play at Brokkie then so be it. I just believe there are other options that should be considered first.
Perhaps they can, as it would be a shame if they spent all of that money building that addition to the Jane Try stand.Mals said:Anyone on Silvertails a structural engineer? I doubt it would be possible to safely, substantially increase the height of the existing stands.The Who said:HappilyManly said:Wish they built a Northern Stand instead, connected to the Jane Try Stand.
It would stop the winter winds and have the same seating capacity as the eastern hill :idea:
I agree. I'd also like to see the existing stands improved and heightened to increase seating capacity before they touch the Hill.
It would be a sad day if the Hill was dug up, but if it is the only way that we get to play at Brokkie then so be it. I just believe there are other options that should be considered first.
manlywarringah said:In a design that was posted a year or so ago, they were keeping the hill and building a grandstand behind it.
The hill may be smaller than what it is now but i thought there was at least half the hill in front of the new stand.
I also thought they were trying to put terrace type of seating in front of the Jane Try Stand all the way down to the fence.
I'd imagine there would be a few different versions depending on costs.
A smaller hill is a must for me as i'd hate to see it go altogether but love the idea of a stand behind it to house more comfortable seating and corporates.
We need the corporate dollars coming in to match the other teams.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 74 | 14 |
2 | Storm | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 78 | 12 |
3 | Raiders | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 58 | 12 |
4 | Warriors | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | -4 | 12 |
5 | Broncos | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 78 | 10 |
6 | Sharks | 9 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 49 | 10 |
7 | Sea Eagles | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 36 | 10 |
8 | Cowboys | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | -10 | 10 |
9 | Tigers | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 8 |
10 | Dragons | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | -8 | 8 |
11 | Roosters | 9 | 4 | 0 | 5 | -42 | 8 |
12 | Rabbitohs | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | -44 | 8 |
13 | Dolphins | 9 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
14 | Titans | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -68 | 6 |
15 | Knights | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -74 | 6 |
16 | Eels | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -117 | 6 |
17 | Panthers | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -26 | 4 |