Galvin

That's possible I guess. Still think he'll end up @ Parra.
If he does it makes a lie of his claim that he wants to play under a proven coach and for a club likely to challenge for a premiership.
I know Easts have says they'd have no dealings with a Moses client but Galvin is an obvious fit for them; far more sensible than recruiting DCE.
As for Canterbury, where he is most likely to end up, their coach hasn't proven anything, yet.
 
If he does it makes a lie of his claim that he wants to play under a proven coach and for a club likely to challenge for a premiership.
I know Easts have says they'd have no dealings with a Moses client but Galvin is an obvious fit for them; far more sensible than recruiting DCE.
As for Canterbury, where he is most likely to end up, their coach hasn't proven anything, yet.
Not sure I’ve seen Galvin actually say those words.The journos have been saying it and some of them are Isaac Moses’ mouthpiece and Moses has had a long standing feud with Benji,so I suspect therein lies the story.As for Ryles,I’d suggest he’s had more experience in coaching than Benji has,given his time at many clubs as an assistant and a bit of time under Eddie Jones in the England Union set up
 
Whoever signs him must do so for market value. None of this he wants to win a Premier BS. The Tigers offered him 6.5 million for six years, an amount that must be reflected in his new clubs salary if the NRL serious. I'm sick of the double standards we see between the big clubs and the rest.
Here you are saying whoever he signs for has to pay him market value.

You then say whoever signs him has to pay him an amount that 'reflects' what the Tigers offered him.

What range do you consider an amount that 'reflects' what the Tigers offered him?
 
No, it doesn't work that way. The Tigers are part of the market. That is what they were prepared to offer him. Where does it say if only one club offers big money it won't be considered in determining a players market value?
Here you are disagreeing with someone saying what the Tigers offered him isn't his market value.
 
If he does it makes a lie of his claim that he wants to play under a proven coach and for a club likely to challenge for a premiership.
I know Easts have says they'd have no dealings with a Moses client but Galvin is an obvious fit for them; far more sensible than recruiting DCE.
As for Canterbury, where he is most likely to end up, their coach hasn't proven anything, yet.
Agree on your first point. See my post from yesterday which I stated same. How many halves do the Rorters need then ? However if Galvin scuttled DCE'S plans it would prove there is a God and he loves us. Third point : yes but he's good.
 
Here you go @47MVEagle read this post by @EaglesDontTweet

I'm surprised so many supporters are not aware of the Fair market value rule.
Here you are telling me to look at a post that quotes Danny Weidler saying the NRL market value for DCE is $400k.

But hang on, Manly offered him $750k a year for 2 seasons - does what Manly offered him now trump the NRL's market value amount, you know, like how Galvin's market value is now (according to you) $6.5m over 6 years because that's what the Tigers offered him?
 
Here you are saying whoever he signs for has to pay him market value.

You then say whoever signs him has to pay him an amount that 'reflects' what the Tigers offered him.

What range do you consider an amount that 'reflects' what the Tigers offered him?
Market Value as determined by the NRL. My goodness you are trying. So if the Tigers offered around 1.1 million, the fair market value should be around 800k.
 
Agree on your first point. See my post from yesterday which I stated same. How many halves do the Rorters need then ? However if Galvin scuttled DCE'S plans it would prove there is a God and he loves us. Third point : yes but he's good.
Straight from Galvin's godfathers mouth, at 7.30 last night, he has already been released from tigers, he was at homebush last night at that time with Gus and ciraldo. Other clubs wanting to talk to him are parra,dolphins and Penrith.
 
Market Value as determined by the NRL. My goodness you are trying. So if the Tigers offered around 1.1 million, the fair market value should be around 800k.
No kidding, 'market value as determined by the NRL', not 'market value determined by you based on what the Tigers offered him'.

So in your opinion, Galvin's market value is $800k?

How does that 'reflect' what the Tigers offered him? $6.5m over 6 years = $1.083m.

That's a difference of ~$200k.

Kind of an arbitrary method you've used there lol.
 
Here you are telling me to look at a post that quotes Danny Weidler saying the NRL market value for DCE is $400k.

But hang on, Manly offered him $750k a year for 2 seasons - does what Manly offered him now trump the NRL's market value amount, you know, like how Galvin's market value is now (according to you) $6.5m over 6 years because that's what the Tigers offered him?
You are world class. Honestly, sometimes a person just needs to step back and shake their head in Biffing amazement. This is one of those occasions. Absolute world champion status!
 
You are world class. Honestly, sometimes a person just needs to step back and shake their head in Biffing amazement. This is one of those occasions. Absolute world champion status!
Is that you beating a retreat Biff?

See ya next time you start carrying on like you know everything LOL.
 
Elite level! Possibly top 1% worldwide.
Don't avoid this one Biff:

No kidding, 'market value as determined by the NRL', not 'market value determined by you based on what the Tigers offered him'.

So in your opinion, Galvin's market value is $800k?

How does that 'reflect' what the Tigers offered him? $6.5m over 6 years = $1.083m.

That's a difference of ~$200k.

Kind of an arbitrary method you've used there lol.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

2020 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Bulldogs 10 9 0 1 110 20
2 Warriors 10 8 0 2 5 18
3 Raiders 11 8 0 3 64 16
4 Storm 10 6 0 4 135 14
5 Sharks 11 7 0 4 70 14
6 Sea Eagles 10 5 0 5 38 12
7 Rabbitohs 11 6 0 5 -52 12
8 Cowboys 10 4 1 5 -32 11
9 Broncos 11 5 0 6 42 10
10 Dragons 10 4 0 6 -11 10
11 Roosters 10 4 0 6 -46 10
12 Tigers 11 5 0 6 -54 10
13 Panthers 10 3 1 6 -2 9
14 Dolphins 11 4 0 7 6 8
15 Knights 10 3 0 7 -74 8
16 Eels 10 3 0 7 -99 8
17 Titans 10 3 0 7 -100 8
Back
Top Bottom