D
Deleted member 24974
Guest
It's all about dentifing the talent and developing them into grand final wining team. Trent may be able to do this but I know Des can.
We had a great core of talent that developed through the years from 05 onwards. Matai, Gift, Snake, Choc, Beaver, King, etc....!
And our recruits for 05, 06 and 07 were mostly amazing. Amongst them Kennedy, Kite, Orford and Killer were all extremely talented, had great attitudes, were natural leaders and were all round good blokes as well.
We did not recruit a great deal of has been journey men or reserve graders hoping they would become first graders.
Our recruitment and core talent was truly top notch. Our recruitment at present is not (although we do have some great core talent).
I reckon after looking back at the players there were loads of journey types who played their role and our recruitment now is great in my opinion. The titles were a result of many years recruitment , this is year one or two.We had a great core of talent that developed through the years from 05 onwards. Matai, Gift, Snake, Choc, Beaver, King, etc....!
And our recruits for 05, 06 and 07 were mostly amazing. Amongst them Kennedy, Kite, Orford and Killer were all extremely talented, had great attitudes, were natural leaders and were all round good blokes as well.
We did not recruit a great deal of has been journey men or reserve graders hoping they would become first graders.
Our recruitment and core talent was truly top notch. Our recruitment at present is not (although we do have some great core talent).
Wouldn't hold a candle to Kite and especially Kennedy.Gillett and Asofa-Solomona as comparison possibly
Williame will never be a great first grader. He is just not up to it. He will not develop anymore. The others except for Blake Green the sky is the limit and I would include Parker in that, there is a lot to like about Parker.Not just them Turbo, we have got Matt Parcell, Frank Winterstein, Matthew Wright, Blake Green and Wiliame
The future looks bright if these players can gel and develop some form together.
I reckon after looking back at the players there were loads of journey types who played their role and our recruitment now is great in my opinion. The titles were a result of many years recruitment , this is year one or two.
Come again???? When Des Hasler and Noel Cleal arrived in 2004, they had 14 players, half of which were fringe players, and the club was near enough broke. When Barrett arrived, he walked players at his discretion (Ballin, Hiku) and was given players he demanded (Walker, Brown, Taupau). This is not to mention the fact that he had an established first grade squad. The club has had injuries granted, but his list management and recruitment has been poor at best.Your comparison is grossly inaccurate.In 2004 Hasler finished his maiden year as a 1st grade coach. His team finished in 13th position and conceded 30 points a game(754). A young fullback shone despite this and hinted at better things to come. In 2016 Barrett will finish in a similar position in his maiden season with a developing roster as well , the defence conceeding 23 points a game. A young fullback shone brightly again. To win a title from this lowly position the club recruited very well and everyone played a role in a great era.
To say he had an established 1st grade squad is the illusion that is causing so much grief. You are not worth debating with.Come again???? When Des Hasler and Noel Cleal arrived in 2004, they had 14 players, half of which were fringe players, and the club was near enough broke. When Barrett arrived, he walked players at his discretion (Ballin, Hiku) and was given players he demanded (Walker, Brown, Taupau). This is not to mention the fact that he had an established first grade squad. The club has had injuries granted, but his list management and recruitment has been poor at best.Your comparison is grossly inaccurate.
Hasler finishes 13th and he has plenty of reasons , Barrett does the same and he has none. Somehow Neil Henry would enter the debate if it suited your point but I doubt it does. Try John Lang in his first year at Penrith but see if everything is true about Barretts woeful effort are you able to say that proves what will happen in 17 and 18? Any takers on results in these years? Most are hoping for top 8 but some appear certain it can't happen under Barrett .Well considering in 2003 we finished 14th at least Des improved the ****ing side in his first season. Barrett has taken us backwards. Back in '04 we knew we were in for a rough season and the club never pretended otherwise. At the start of this season we had owners and club staff waxing lyrical about how great they'd done to build this roster. Now they've failed miserably and they're just spitting out excuses.
I'm sorry, but you can't polish the turd that has been our 2016 season, or the failings of our front office and coaching staff.
Hasler had a bottom 4 squad & twenty had a to 4 squad. The similarities are eerie.In 2004 Hasler finished his maiden year as a 1st grade coach. His team finished in 13th position and conceded 30 points a game(754). A young fullback shone despite this and hinted at better things to come. In 2016 Barrett will finish in a similar position in his maiden season with a developing roster as well , the defence conceeding 23 points a game. A young fullback shone brightly again. To win a title from this lowly position the club recruited very well and everyone played a role in a great era.
I think you might be mistaking Barrett with Zorba and Bozo. As for the three recruits you mentioned, Tapau has been excellent in the second half of the season - he is a top buy for us.Come again???? When Des Hasler and Noel Cleal arrived in 2004, they had 14 players, half of which were fringe players, and the club was near enough broke. When Barrett arrived, he walked players at his discretion (Ballin, Hiku) and was given players he demanded (Walker, Brown, Taupau). This is not to mention the fact that he had an established first grade squad. The club has had injuries granted, but his list management and recruitment has been poor at best.Your comparison is grossly inaccurate.
Funny how some view the recruitment under Barrett as a joke and clueless but when he finishes way down the ladder it's a stellar lineup. Like Hasler, Barrett has players run out on the field who will not be in a title winning team and some that will.Hasler had a bottom 4 squad & twenty had a to 4 squad. The similarities are eerie.
The recruitment plan of those two is many years down the track at another club. Their own recruitment record at the dogs is dismal against their own record at Manly . They could be humanThat 04 team suffered some horrible beatings that year but we did see some young talent emerge and we all know what happened in th following years. The difference this time is I dont see the depth of young talent coming through and I do not see a recruitment plan that Des and Crusher put in place.
I reckon after looking back at the players there were loads of journey types who played their role and our recruitment now is great in my opinion. The titles were a result of many years recruitment , this is year one or two.
Apparently a cleaner was peaking thru the keyhole and saw Barrett slapping Bozo around when he wouldn't agree to these signings and when Zorba stepped in a couple of drumsticks disappeared from his snack pack and no further objections were lodged when Lewis Browns name came upCome again???? When Des Hasler and Noel Cleal arrived in 2004, they had 14 players, half of which were fringe players, and the club was near enough broke. When Barrett arrived, he walked players at his discretion (Ballin, Hiku) and was given players he demanded (Walker, Brown, Taupau). This is not to mention the fact that he had an established first grade squad. The club has had injuries granted, but his list management and recruitment has been poor at best.Your comparison is grossly inaccurate.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 74 | 14 |
2 | Storm | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 78 | 12 |
3 | Raiders | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 58 | 12 |
4 | Warriors | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | -4 | 12 |
5 | Broncos | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 78 | 10 |
6 | Cowboys | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | -10 | 10 |
7 | Sharks | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 39 | 8 |
8 | Sea Eagles | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 36 | 8 |
9 | Tigers | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 8 |
10 | Dragons | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | -8 | 8 |
11 | Rabbitohs | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | -44 | 8 |
12 | Dolphins | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 16 | 6 |
13 | Roosters | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | -52 | 6 |
14 | Titans | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -68 | 6 |
15 | Knights | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -74 | 6 |
16 | Eels | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -107 | 6 |
17 | Panthers | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -26 | 4 |