Haumole facing 1-2 weeks

[Ben]

This has to be up there with on of the worst decisions from the Bunker and MRC I’ve seen. There is no evidence of a high shot along with Tolman coming straight back on milking the interchange system. They got this completely wrong. Manly loading at it’s absolute finest.

 

[Highflier]

Took the guilty

two poo got a week.

Wait what so my anti NRL -MRC rhetoric and fiery outrage was all for nothing ???
Say it aint so ,,,,,

I'll let myself out

 

[WiseyEagle]

Already taken the early plea as well, I thought.

Oh I haven't seen that? Going by NRL site, says TBC

 

[Eagle 1]

Why? It was a legal tackle?
Not everyone charged is guilty. Other clubs fight for their players. Not us. Pathetic.

We also have DE-kline to thank for this, he was the one to recommend the charge on O. If we get deKline at 4 Pines again I'll scream..

 

[The '47ers]

Weak as piss, grow some balls Manly. Get someone to throw together a video montage of other hits/outcomes etc. Have a go ffs

 

[globaleagle]

The judiciary seems like they've always made their minds up and are even a tad indignant that charges get challenged (s.o.o. and rorters are exceptions.)

It like the judiciary sit back smoking their cigars, eating their caviar saying that usually...

the ref has penalised you, or
the bunker has penalised you.
then the "independent" and "knowledgeable" mrc committee have deemed it worthy of a charge...

so how dare you waste our time daring to challenge this penalty!

How dare you!

So I believe the judiciary already have made their minds up and unless one can show 100% an inaccuracy, the extra suspension will stand.

In the fantasy land ivory tower the judiciary live in they must believe that all criminals simply plead guilty and there are no court cases in the real world.

 

[globaleagle]

Also...

One &*^^ing week, what an absolute farce.

Roosters winger Daniel Tupou has taken an early guilty plea to a grade two careless high tackle for his hit on Dragon Mikaele Ravalawa at the SCG on Monday and will miss the round eight clash with the Bulldogs.

And nothing for the JWH hip drop.

Sigh... I'm sure annesley will explain everything and there'll be some hard hitting questions from jour-'no's'


Interesting that in the media's desperation to keep uncle nick happy and sweep the joke of one week under the carpet....they've turned to serial grub Mcguire to do a whole article on how he was happy there was no send off and only a week suspension.

The media really think we're idiots...maybe we are for reading their rubbish.

 

[castle eagle]

Guacca accepts a one week ban.
How weak is the Manly club? Was it too costly to challenge?
Pathetic.

maybe nothing to do with it but remember 2008?
scum smith not accepting a suspension early in the season & then getting charged again forcing him to miss the record setting g.f. scoreline of 40-0.

 

[The Who]

maybe nothing to do with it but remember 2008?
scum smith not accepting a suspension early in the season & then getting charged again forcing him to miss the record setting g.f. scoreline of 40-0.

There are no carry-over points this season.

 

[Ryan]

Typical off field sloppy work by our club here. Everything on and off the field done in half efforts, right now.

I recall everyone was up in arms about Steve Matai getting medically retired. I wrote the NRL about similar cases and other players / clubs getting the compensation.

They politely said to me Manly hadn't even bothered asking or even making a phone call, and they'd be happy to consider it.

Sloppy, sloppy, sloppy.

 

[Ryan]

Whilst he won't be there this week, he'll have a decent replacement to come into the team against Souths.

Karl Lawton mate ! Awesome.

 

[Mitch]

Karl Lawton mate ! Awesome.

Wait until kick off and then come with your smart arse comments. Schuster will be there.

 

[Ryan]

Wait until kick off and then come with your smart arse comments. Schuster will be there.

Mate, I was hoping it was going to give you a chuckle , not get triggered to be honest. Sorry I said anything.

Just read where you said wait until 4.

 

[Mitch]

Mate, I was hoping it was going to give you a chuckle , not get triggered to be honest. Sorry I said anything.

Just read where you said wait until 4.

Fair call mate, probably flew off the handle too quickly. 4pm with Schuster being named in the squad. He’ll come in which will be a big positive to the side.

 

[voicefromthehill]

Typical off field sloppy work by our club here. Everything on and off the field done in half efforts, right now.

I recall everyone was up in arms about Steve Matai getting medically retired. I wrote the NRL about similar cases and other players / clubs getting the compensation.

They politely said to me Manly hadn't even bothered asking or even making a phone call, and they'd be happy to consider it.

Sloppy, sloppy, sloppy.

NRL requests more information from Manly Sea Eagles on Steve Matai medical retirement

NRL responds to Matai medical claims

www.foxsports.com.au

Manly decide future of fallen stars | Sporting News Australia

The Manly Sea Eagles have taken the drastic step of seeking medical retirement clearances from the NRL for both Brett Stewart and Steve Matai.

www.sportingnews.com

Sea Eagles seek medical retirement clearances

Manly Warringah Sea Eagles are seeking medical retirement clearances from the NRL for its dual premiership winners and one club champions Brett Stewart and Steve Matai.

www.seaeagles.com.au

Seems there is contrary information - never been like the NRL especially under the then Greenberg tenure to be less than honest.

 

[Ryan]

NRL requests more information from Manly Sea Eagles on Steve Matai medical retirement

NRL responds to Matai medical claims

www.foxsports.com.au

Manly decide future of fallen stars | Sporting News Australia

The Manly Sea Eagles have taken the drastic step of seeking medical retirement clearances from the NRL for both Brett Stewart and Steve Matai.

www.sportingnews.com

Sea Eagles seek medical retirement clearances

Manly Warringah Sea Eagles are seeking medical retirement clearances from the NRL for its dual premiership winners and one club champions Brett Stewart and Steve Matai.

www.seaeagles.com.au

Seems there is contrary information - never been like the NRL especially under the then Greenberg tenure to be less than honest.

That was exactly the point. We were of the belief Manly had done this or that , but in reality, they'd done absolutely nothing (according to the NRL - in writing).

 

[master blaster]

Also...

One &*^^ing week, what an absolute farce.

Roosters winger Daniel Tupou has taken an early guilty plea to a grade two careless high tackle for his hit on Dragon Mikaele Ravalawa at the SCG on Monday and will miss the round eight clash with the Bulldogs.

And nothing for the JWH hip drop.

Sigh... I'm sure annesley will explain everything and there'll be some hard hitting questions from jour-'no's'


Interesting that in the media's desperation to keep uncle nick happy and sweep the joke of one week under the carpet....they've turned to serial grub Mcguire to do a whole article on how he was happy there was no send off and only a week suspension.

The media really think we're idiots...maybe we are for reading their rubbish.

An absolute joke but there is no bias ,no way. Its disgraceful

 

[mave]

Typical off field sloppy work by our club here. Everything on and off the field done in half efforts, right now.

I recall everyone was up in arms about Steve Matai getting medically retired. I wrote the NRL about similar cases and other players / clubs getting the compensation.

They politely said to me Manly hadn't even bothered asking or even making a phone call, and they'd be happy to consider it.

Sloppy, sloppy, sloppy.

So you are whinging about half efforts "right now".....then cite an example of alledged half efforts from years ago as proof.

 

[mave]

Some other merkin asked it the other day....


Has our club ever done anything right?

You wouldn't ****ing think so, the way people post here, at times.

 

[Kiwi Eagle]

That was exactly the point. We were of the belief Manly had done this or that , but in reality, they'd done absolutely nothing (according to the NRL - in writing).

If Manly hadn’t done anything, why would the NRL be requesting more information ?