Danny the Worm has always had 3 favourite PR subjects for his column. Mundane, $BW and Mason. I'm not saying that Wilie is the source of his current dribble, but I wouldn't be straight out blaming Choc either.
my feeling is we are going to lose both
I have a feeling we'll keep both. I don't why...I just do.
Do you have mail?We will, mark my words 🙂
Just bills. Oh ... you weren't talking to me.Do you have mail?
Sweet!I have mail
Just bills. Oh ... you weren't talking to me.
Some people always will, but I don't think you should generalise. It's a forum where everyone has a right to a say. No need to be hurtful. I suspect the more intelligent of the members are the ones who can read a great many stories and combine that with their opinions to come up with a theory. For example, last year we had a great many stories about Watmough as agitator. Watmough used Weidler repeatedly to, in my opinion, agitate. Now Weidler comes out with an insider Manly story and it's not hard to jump to the conclusion that Watmough was the source, especially after his ranting this week. Of course it may be wrong, but where's the harm?I just love how people pick and choose to decide which bit of which story they believe. I wonder if some people even realise it when they do it, but there are plenty of posts where someone discredits a story as being obvious media BS with another story. People are picking and choosing what they want to believe based on a preconceived perception of the people/players involved.
To put it simply- believe the good news, don't believe the bad..I just love how people pick and choose to decide which bit of which story they believe. I wonder if some people even realise it when they do it, but there are plenty of posts where someone discredits a story as being obvious media BS with another story. People are picking and choosing what they want to believe based on a preconceived perception of the people/players involved.
Some people always will, but I don't think you should generalise. It's a forum where everyone has a right to a say. No need to be hurtful. I suspect the more intelligent of the members are the ones who can read a great many stories and combine that with their opinions to come up with a theory. For example, last year we had a great many stories about Watmough as agitator. Watmough used Weidler repeatedly to, in my opinion, agitate. Now Weidler comes out with an insider Manly story and it's not hard to jump to the conclusion that Watmough was the source, especially after his ranting this week. Of course it may be wrong, but where's the harm?
WhoConsidering I saw them having a chat together last night things might not be too irreparable between them.
Snake and DCE.P
Who
Snake: You keep sniffing. Did you catch a cold up on the Goldy?Snake and DCE.
Yeah. Snake called DCE an overpriced little C..eagle.😀Snake and DCE.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 74 | 14 |
2 | Warriors | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 14 |
3 | Storm | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 78 | 12 |
4 | Raiders | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 58 | 12 |
5 | Broncos | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 78 | 10 |
6 | Sharks | 9 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 49 | 10 |
7 | Sea Eagles | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 36 | 10 |
8 | Tigers | 9 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 10 |
9 | Cowboys | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | -14 | 10 |
10 | Dragons | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | -14 | 8 |
11 | Roosters | 9 | 4 | 0 | 5 | -42 | 8 |
12 | Knights | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | -48 | 8 |
13 | Rabbitohs | 9 | 4 | 0 | 5 | -70 | 8 |
14 | Dolphins | 9 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
15 | Titans | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -68 | 6 |
16 | Eels | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -117 | 6 |
17 | Panthers | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -26 | 4 |