Funny this place , 2 days ago everyone was up in arms about him coming.With his poor coaching record why would any club consider Daley?
Now , they are screaming from the rooftops because he declined the offer.
It’s hilarious really.
Funny this place , 2 days ago everyone was up in arms about him coming.With his poor coaching record why would any club consider Daley?
You can’t see that the two situations correlate? People were unhappy the club were even looking at Daley due to his ordinary track record as a coach.Granted,a few STers went off a bit early given the fact the exact role he may of been offered,was not disclosed.They are now upset with the club because even Laurie Daley has knocked them back.these opinions aren’t necessarily mutually exclusive?Funny this place , 2 days ago everyone was up in arms about him coming.
Now , they are screaming from the rooftops because he declined the offer.
It’s hilarious really.
No I don’t see how they correlate.You can’t see that the two situations correlate? People were unhappy the club were even looking at Daley due to his ordinary track record as a coach.Granted,a few STers went off a bit early given the fact the exact role he may of been offered,was not disclosed.They are now upset with the club because even Laurie Daley has knocked them back.these opinions aren’t necessarily mutually exclusive?
The journo was on the money.Manly did chase him,he had a call with Seibold,prior to the news being leaked and that’s where they decided to have a face to face catch up.I am not a Seibold fan and I wanted him gone from day 1,but I know turfing him doesn’t solve the issues,by a long stretch,but it’s a start.No I don’t see how they correlate.
Some journo gets a rumour that the club are hunting Daley ( for whatever reason ), fact or fiction , who knows !!
Then stated “ we haven’t even sat down to discuss yet “ , just a casual statement.
Then , “ well it can’t work anyway as it doesn’t fit in with media / NSW commitments “.
Mean while ST goes off BECAUSE he’s being considered , and then goes off AGAIN because he knocked it back.
If you cannot see the hypocrisy in all this then I think you need to look again.
The anti Seibold members are so desperate to discredit him ( now he hasn’t been sacked ) that every single little thing happening is ALL because of him.
Now let me assure you I’m not pro Seibold , but I’m certainly not anti either and I don’t think every issue at the club all relates to him.
Well , if that’s the case I have to say , “ so what “.The journo was on the money.Manly did chase him,he had a call with Seibold,prior to the news being leaked and that’s where they decided to have a face to face catch up.I am not a Seibold fan and I wanted him gone from day 1,but I know turfing him doesn’t solve the issues,by a long stretch,but it’s a start.
STers are upset at the whole s..tshow the club has become ,as highlighted by the outrage(some misguided)at the thought of chasing Daley and then the fact Daley knocked them back.
With his poor coaching record why would any club consider Daley?
What I find hilarious about this place is people who are quite prepared to slag off the owner at every opportunity, but then get all judgemental about people who take exception to actions taken by the club that owner is in charge of. For example, Penn hired Seibold, but Penn is useless whilst Seibold is above criticism. The pro-Seibold crowd seem to have this blind faith in his abilities despite evidence to the contrary, and would rather blame Penn for everything that goes wrong. Did someone say “hypocrisy”?You can’t see that the two situations correlate? People were unhappy the club were even looking at Daley due to his ordinary track record as a coach.Granted,a few STers went off a bit early given the fact the exact role he may of been offered,was not disclosed.They are now upset with the club because even Laurie Daley has knocked them back.these opinions aren’t necessarily mutually exclusive?
Don’t think we ever found out , but as usual lots of supposition on ST.But's it's not a coaching role? Or is it?
I’m not saying the head coach is the only issue Manly has,but the past 10 years of coach signings have been horrendous.A rookie in Barrett who has gone on to be proven yet again that he’s not up to the top post,Des who was struggling for work after a poor final few yrs at the Dogs and now Seibold.What I find hilarious about this place is people who are quite prepared to slag off the owner at every opportunity, but then get all judgemental about people who take exception to actions taken by the club that owner is in charge of. For example, Penn hired Seibold, but Penn is useless whilst Seibold is above criticism. The pro-Seibold crowd seem to have this blind faith in his abilities despite evidence to the contrary, and would rather blame Penn for everything that goes wrong. Did someone say “hypocrisy”?
The obvious answer is that Penn is indeed a large part of the problem, and that hiring Seibold is clear evidence of that.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Raiders | 24 | 19 | 0 | 5 | 148 | 44 |
2 | Storm | 24 | 17 | 0 | 7 | 212 | 40 |
3 | Bulldogs | 24 | 16 | 0 | 8 | 120 | 38 |
4 | Broncos | 24 | 15 | 0 | 9 | 172 | 36 |
5 | Sharks | 24 | 15 | 0 | 9 | 109 | 36 |
6 | Warriors | 24 | 14 | 0 | 10 | 21 | 34 |
7 | Panthers | 24 | 13 | 1 | 10 | 107 | 33 |
8 | Roosters | 24 | 13 | 0 | 11 | 132 | 32 |
9 | Dolphins | 24 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 125 | 30 |
10 | Sea Eagles | 24 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 21 | 30 |
11 | Eels | 24 | 10 | 0 | 14 | -76 | 26 |
12 | Cowboys | 24 | 9 | 1 | 14 | -146 | 25 |
13 | Tigers | 24 | 9 | 0 | 15 | -135 | 24 |
14 | Rabbitohs | 24 | 9 | 0 | 15 | -181 | 24 |
15 | Dragons | 24 | 8 | 0 | 16 | -130 | 22 |
16 | Titans | 24 | 6 | 0 | 18 | -199 | 18 |
17 | Knights | 24 | 6 | 0 | 18 | -300 | 18 |