40 years an eagle
Bencher
I should have at least arent the right to speak my mind.
You have buddy but you keep repeating yourself ad nauseum. We heard you the first 50 times and you keep going on and on. Get it?
I should have at least arent the right to speak my mind.
He isn't at his best but he can also use some more reliable wingers to help, better coaching and more experience. His defence is not as bad as most portray.I totally agree with your above point.
How about his woeful defensive positioning and tackling? He doesn't play as part of a defensive UNIT.
I keep repeating my self as do all the others who want Tom out of the fullback role. Sorry but to me that's a hypocritical comment. I'll repeat a comment if it fits the given discussion and in this case we are speaking about moving Tom which I dont think will ever and should not happen.You have buddy but you keep repeating yourself ad nauseum. We heard you the first 50 times and you keep going on and on. Get it?
G'day all,I agree,apart from being relatively good under the high ball,a lot of his other defensive play is poor.The non tackles on Radley and Yo in the last two games were just embarrassing,(although he ain't Robinson Crusoe in the embarrassing missed tackle department).I totally agree with your above point.
How about his woeful defensive positioning and tackling? He doesn't play as part of a defensive UNIT.
I’m referring to what we have in our squad as of right now and who has already walked out the door... I just can’t see the benefit in getting rid of players like API and Siro and replacing them with unproven players, regardless of whether they have been injured or not. I also think we must have some room to sign players with the cap rise and the amount of players we’ve let walk out the door. The Rorters situation is just plain old ridiculous. If you add up the alleged contract value of their top 17 players players, there is virtually nothing left and they somehow sign Hall and Morris... it’s a joke.I totally agree with your above point.
How about his woeful defensive positioning and tackling? He doesn't play as part of a defensive UNIT.
I’m referring to what we have in our squad as of right now and who has already walked out the door... I just can’t see the benefit in getting rid of players like API and Siro and replacing them with unproven players, regardless of whether they have been injured or not. I also think we must have some room to sign players with the cap rise and the amount of players we’ve let walk out the door. The Rorters situation is just plain old ridiculous. If you add up the alleged contract value of their top 17 players players, there is virtually nothing left and they somehow sign Hall and Morris... it’s a joke.
How much are we paying Marty, looks like he might be gonski in 2019, so there’s another $700k or thereabouts.
I can see where you’re coming from man.Mate, I understand where you are coming from but Sirro has only "proven" that he has played 9 games in 2 years and 3 of them have been very good. 700k for 3 very good games. Too much risk FOR US.
I'm happy to replace him with someone of equal cost but I believe at least one of Jetski, Tanga, Amone will be a better replacement.
Api is going to cost close to 500k PA to extend and I don't think it's money well-spent FOR US.
I like the idea of paying ahead to our "magnificent 6" and thus having money to buy the RIGHT 5/8 if the guys we have don't work out.
I would be happy to spend 2019 consolidating for 2020 and on.
Our roster is probably irrelevant anyways if the "club" doesn't get it's own sh!t sorted and provide the personel needed for it to perform at or near it's ability.
I can see where you’re coming from man.
Don't agree, you keep Tom at fullback and have him play a fullback role, instead of always taking the ball and stifling the backline. A good coach will get Tom doing the right things, i feel trent has him too much involved. He was developing fine until this year.
Api is a starter. I can't believe people think he is better off the bench. One of the best 9s in the comp and you want him to play limited minuets? Api can play 80 but preferably he plays a good strong 65 to 70 and if he needs a rest have a backup. Nothing wrong with that. Luke is exactly the same at NZ he plays most of the game but a bench hooker takes his place during his breaks. Koroisaus job in team is destroy the ruck with his speed and creativity as well being a really strong defender. He isn't Cameron Smith he isn't going to be playing that way, he will play the Koroisau way and do it as a first grade starter. He would walk into most clubs number 9 barring Melbourne and South's. And once again Tom isn't like Mitchell as Tom can ball play, one of the best at it and also needs to have the ball as much as possible. Mitchell got moved because he was struggling with the fitness required and couldn't create. Tom doesn't have these issues all he needs to do is work on his defence.I think the statement API being the most creative hooker in the game is the most telling. He is an instinctive raw weapon and would be the games best seventeen. He doesn't organise or create. He busts his gut and is fast and elusive.
On tom. He will be an Australian centre for the next ten years if played there alongside Mitchell. Mitchell came through as a fullback - that's where you play the freaks in the juniors because they get their hands on the ball all the time and win games against boys. I'd rather see a faster more agile player saving tries and igniting attacks. If that's tom Wright or jade anderson than the chance should be taken. Mitchell will be on a million a year soon and no chance he is going to shift Tedesco at the roosters. Wright without the constant defensive pressure at centre or six might be one of the best we can imagine. He has the creative nous from his schoolboy five eighth days and speed to burn.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 9 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 106 | 18 |
2 | Warriors | 9 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 16 |
3 | Storm | 9 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 140 | 14 |
4 | Raiders | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 48 | 14 |
5 | Sharks | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 65 | 12 |
6 | Cowboys | 9 | 4 | 1 | 4 | -14 | 11 |
7 | Broncos | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 46 | 10 |
8 | Sea Eagles | 9 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 20 | 10 |
9 | Roosters | 9 | 4 | 0 | 5 | -42 | 10 |
10 | Tigers | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | -44 | 10 |
11 | Rabbitohs | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | -62 | 10 |
12 | Dolphins | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 10 | 8 |
13 | Dragons | 9 | 3 | 0 | 6 | -15 | 8 |
14 | Knights | 9 | 3 | 0 | 6 | -52 | 8 |
15 | Titans | 9 | 3 | 0 | 6 | -84 | 8 |
16 | Panthers | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | -2 | 7 |
17 | Eels | 9 | 2 | 0 | 7 | -121 | 6 |