[poll] Should Johns still be considered as an 'Immortal'?

  • We had an issue with background services between march 10th and 15th or there about. This meant the payment services were not linking to automatic upgrades. If you paid for premium membership and are still seeing ads please let me know and the email you used against PayPal and I cam manually verify and upgrade your account.

Should Andrew Johns still be considered as a future 'Immortal'?

  • Yes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
[poll] Should Johns still be considered as an 'Immortal'?

I thought clubs were doing in club test for a couple of years now. Just not compulsory though I guess.
 
[poll] Should Johns still be considered as an 'Immortal'?

Clubs can do in house testing - the issue is what do they do with the results. You can put money on the fact that positive findings have been undisclosed and certain players have succumbed to 'serious injury' for a time. Herein lies part of the problem.

Does a club take harsh action against a player who is an important resource related to their main business - which is winning football matches?

Whilst a loose cannon, Joey won games for the Knights so why take action that might risk him walking (to somebody else) or loosing him for extended periods?
 

Latest posts

Team P W L PD Pts
7 6 1 54 14
6 5 1 59 12
6 4 2 53 10
6 4 2 30 10
7 4 2 25 9
8 4 4 73 8
7 4 3 40 8
7 4 3 24 8
7 3 4 17 8
7 4 3 -8 8
8 4 4 -60 8
8 3 4 17 7
6 2 4 -31 6
7 3 4 -41 6
7 2 5 -29 4
7 1 6 -87 4
7 1 6 -136 4
Back
Top Bottom