47MVEagle
First Grader
Fair enough, in response I'll quote what I posted to @The Who who also selectively quoted my post.No I don't.
They're just the good players in our pathways systems; every club has 3 or 4 guns. That's not an investment in youth, that's just par for the course across every club in the NRL; there's so much more to it than that. An investment in youth is anything but apparent when you wind up with our Dad's Army pack of forwards. An investment in youth is a swarm of young talent already in the FG side and a production line nipping at their heels.
The ball was dropped years ago. I don't entirely blame Seibs; Des was hardly building a production line himself. Just because we have a couple of promising players in the lower grade, does not constitute an investment in youth; every club in the NRL has a NSW Cup, SG Ball, Matts side, etc. Someone has to be playing in those sides.
I'll also add the fact the club severed ties with the Western pathways system implemented by the Fultons & brought it back to our local catchment area. Obviously it will take time to see results from that since it only happened last year.
The very next sentence in my post answered that:
"These guys obviously have to develop & come through the system".
We've seen Navale & Faulalo so far this season. It's possible (highly likely in the Large brothers given their ages at 16 & 17) the others are deemed not ready yet.
Last edited: