Souths Penalty Try

Frank said:
The old saying "a bird in the hand is better than two in the bush" comes to mind.

you reminded me of one of my favourite pieces of graffiti;

"an orgasm in the bush is worth................"


oh, and by the way, I think it was a generous decision but agree with the logic from ads above re changing the slant of the wording and justifying it by the fact that illegal play removes your rights to a fair trial - or something!
 
I agree with chip & chase 100%.

A try was likely, but not certain. In my opinion the sin bin would have been a better option here.

A penalty try was far too generous in this case.
 
Yep, as above posters. Don't forget Dugan would've got a reasonable shot on him just as he would've got the ball, so no cert to score - 70/30 to score in my book.
Sin Bin & penalty would be my verdict - yes even if it was Snake that got tackled.
 
I agree that a penalty and 10 in the bin would have been sufficient.
There was still 20% uncertainty that he might not have scored.
On that basis, I don't think it should have been a penalty try.
 
Because GI plays for Souths and used to play for Melbourne, I think he should have received 10 in the bin and a penalty to Canberra.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

Latest posts

2020 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Bulldogs 7 6 0 1 74 14
2 Storm 7 5 0 2 78 12
3 Raiders 8 6 0 2 58 12
4 Warriors 7 5 0 2 -4 12
5 Broncos 8 5 0 3 78 10
6 Sharks 9 5 0 4 49 10
7 Sea Eagles 8 4 0 4 36 10
8 Cowboys 7 4 0 3 -10 10
9 Tigers 8 4 0 4 14 8
10 Dragons 7 3 0 4 -8 8
11 Roosters 9 4 0 5 -42 8
12 Rabbitohs 8 4 0 4 -44 8
13 Dolphins 9 3 0 6 6 6
14 Titans 7 2 0 5 -68 6
15 Knights 7 2 0 5 -74 6
16 Eels 8 2 0 6 -117 6
17 Panthers 8 2 0 6 -26 4
Back
Top Bottom